Which is more practical, Sony a7m II or a7r II?

I have both machines. First of all, the pixels of R must be very good. If the photos you take are for printout, R is the best choice. However, there are some minor problems with this machine. When shooting online, the speed is too slow to control the rhythm. Second, the requirements for the lens are very high. I can't even satisfy 4200w pixels with the original G lens.

The above picture is a comparison between the Canon 24-70 f2.8 II +metabones4 adapter ring on the left and the Sony 24-70 F2.8 G lens on the right. The difference is visible to the naked eye. The fuselage is Sony A7r mark2.

O1001160s. It would be better to buy a Canon adapter ring. The A7s2 is very fast, and the focus is average. There is no way to compare with A7r2, but it is very suitable for shooting themes such as sweeping the street or lifestyle. Generally, I turn the Canon lens by manual focusing. The lens of A7s2 transferred to other factories can hardly focus. The focus is too far away from R. Because the pixels are not high, you can shoot recklessly to avoid missing key images. If it's just a photo of po on a social networking site, A7s2 is definitely enough.

High sense is very violent, and you can get high-quality pictures under almost any conditions. Anyway, you won't use A7s2 for commercial output, will you? Besides, it has such a strong video recording function. So if you shoot still life, portrait and scenery, A7r2 is good. If you shoot fashion or sports, you'd better use Canon Nikon. Shooting video and sweeping the street lifestyle, you can choose A7s2 for daily life records. The picture quality is really great.