Should schools strengthen the system to prevent college students from skipping classes?

In the first aspect, college students are all adults and have their own way of thinking and behavior. If they are supervised like high school students and primary school students, they will also enter the society in the future. Should teachers also be invited to standardize? Social reality is cruel. In order to make college students better adapt to society in the future, they should learn to study consciously in college and learn to work consciously when they go to society in the future. It is possible to become a talent. Otherwise, what's the use of such college students? It is better to strengthen the conscious education of college students than to strictly manage them.

Secondly, should schools also review the quality of teaching? The current education is seriously out of touch with social practice, which makes college students feel that what they have learned is useless. With the rapid development of society, all the textbooks used were published a few years ago, such as e-commerce. Now that the mobile Internet is coming to an end, it is moving towards the era of artificial intelligence. The textbook is still in the early stage of Internet e-commerce. Is this kind of education useful? Now college enrollment is relatively loose. Many schools, like nannies, entertain these students for four years and then send them away safely. As long as they are safe, they don't care what these students have learned and whether they can become talents. Many students' thesis defense passed after dealing with it, and more people downloaded and copied it online. It often happens that two students use the same paper, and even then they can get their diplomas. On the other hand, if you don't graduate without real talents, not only will truancy be reduced, but the reputation of the school will also be improved.

The third aspect is China's education system. China's education is "primary school is strict, middle school is tired, and universities let ducks go." At present, university funds are not obtained by academic achievements, but by relationships. Private universities regard universities as for-profit institutions. Let's not say whether the teachers hired are genuine or not, but at least they must have various diplomas. Teachers are paid according to their grades, not the quality of teaching. In such an education system, there can only be teachers who can cope with errands, professors with mixed qualifications and teachers who engage in textual research. Is it wrong to let such people take the responsibility of spreading karma, educating and dispelling doubts?

Writing here reminds me of the university education in the Republic of China. Gu Hongming, Liu Wendian, Tao Xingzhi, Zhu Ziqing, Shen Congwen and many other romantic figures are so distinctive and lifelike. Maybe the college students at that time were called college students, the universities at that time were called universities, and the teachers at that time were called teachers.

I remember another story. When Tao Xingzhi was in class, he took a big bag to the stage to demonstrate and forced the chicken head to eat rice, but the chicken didn't eat it, so he let go. When the chicken is free, it pecks itself. Just like a student now, if he wants to have a good class, he must be fed. If it's a stone, he won't eat it. Another, you should set him free and let him study consciously, so that you can. Speaking of strengthening control, just like middle school students and primary school students, are college students trained? It is just a puppet, and nothing can be done without control.

?