Which should I choose, Canon 5d4 or Sony A7R3? Why?

Enter 5d4. Although Sony a7r3 has its advantages, I think 5d4 is the best choice from the following perspectives.

Most of the machines used by professional photographers around us are Canon, a few are Sony, and Nikon is even less. Part of it is used as a backup machine, so it can be lighter when shooting videos or going out to play. Real shooting rarely gives a micro-list to others, and many customers will ask to see the pictures on the spot. The people who opened the pictures to the customers are dead. I have been to dozens of photo studios in Guangxi and Hainan before, and it is hard to find that they will take wedding photos with Sony machines.

For more than a month, I traded my friend's a7r3 for 5d3 because it was convenient to travel, which was considered as deep use. After comparison, I think the color of 5d3 will be much more natural, and there will be no obvious color cast. At least among the three brands of Jia, Suo and Ni, Canon's direct color reproduction is better. The Sony spare machine in my hand is a6300, which I don't want to compare with Canon Quan Huafu.

The difficulty of the menu reflects the learning cost and shooting efficiency. Many people may think that the menu is not easy to use, but they are not familiar with the machine. But if they have personally experienced that the menu design is unfriendly and leads to the failure of shooting, the lesson is very profound.

Canon menu design has obvious logic. Shutter, aperture and iso are all placed in the first row of the main menu interface, which can be adjusted quickly and accurately. The overall design follows the common main menu and the uncommon first-level menu, and the function classification is clear. Sony's most frequently adjusted exposure troika is divided into three different positions, and the function of changing the shooting button will also change, which is not conducive to shooting. Forgive me for being stupid and not finding the logic of Sony menu design.

If it is a sunset or a snapshot, the wonderful time will be so short, and so much time will be wasted to find out where the manual focus is, and it will be cold if you find the day lily.

From the perspective of learning cost, if I use Canon camera as an analogy, I can teach a person who knows nothing about photography how to expose correctly in half an hour. If I meet friends who use Sony, I have to take the time to tell them how to adjust the aperture and shutter. Because of the learning cost caused by the menu not being able to take pictures, many people think that buying a SLR is not as good as taking pictures with a mobile phone, and finally they can only give up photography.

Since they are both Quan Huafu, we should take it one step at a time, without changing planes frequently. At this time, the lens group should be spelled. Sony can't compare with Canon in lens richness and cost performance. Some netizens have compared the price of a self-operated e-commerce. Sony's lenses with the same specifications are generally much more expensive than Canon's. It is also a big three yuan, and Sony can afford a body that is more expensive than Canon. This is obviously unfavorable for subsequent addition of lenses.

When using Sony, I also tried to make up for the problem of lens group with adapter ring, but in fact, the quality of focusing dark angle and original lens is worse than a little. I won't talk about it here.

Of course, Sony also has many advantages. It was amazing when I first switched from 5d3 to 6300. It is really too light. Including myself, I am also a Sony user, and friends who play video are also turning to Sony. If you mainly consider portability or need to shoot video, a7r3 is obviously a better choice. If it is not these two factors, push 5d4.

Sony A7R3 is a very powerful micro-single, even in front of Nikon D850, it is very competitive. Sony A7R3 robbed many customers of Nikon D850.

Canon 5D4 is really the main force of professional portrait photography.

But Nikon D850 and Sony A7R3 are inseparable enemies.

However, Canon 5D4 and Sony A7R3 are rivals in dislocation competition, and there is basically no possibility of confrontation.

It all started with Canon's portrait color and straightforwardness.

Sony and Nikon's straightness is close to skin color, and they are not very good.

Canon's straightness and skin color are very good.

For portrait photography, this color and directness are very important for people-oriented video shooting.

Secondly, it is cost-effective.

Don't say that micro-single represents the future trend, just like how you brag that electric vehicles represent the future trend. Do you think it is really good to sell electric vehicles without government subsidies?

It goes without saying that no matter what your future trend is, the most important thing is that I have benefited today.

Sacrificing your wallet for a future trend of Sony micro-single, I think, only the gunman of the manufacturer will say that he is not afraid of wallet and regrets it?

So if you are a photo studio, photography studio, children's photography, wedding photography, wedding photography, conference photography, activity photography, or Canon is the best.

And if you really care about high pixels and high tolerance, then you may be a photo library photographer who contributes to the photo library. As a photo gallery photographer, Nikon D850 or Sony A7R3 is really more suitable, so I won't brag about Canon 5D4.

Simple and rude, practical and pragmatic

1, Canon has the advantages of Canon and Sony has the advantages of Sony. The most important thing is to look at your shooting needs and what you want. If you like strong lens groups, care about portraits but don't care about videos, then choosing Canon is a good choice.

2.5d4 is a comprehensive player. Canon gave him an all-round mission. He can shoot any subject, and there are videos. That's the focus. Continuous shooting can make do, so can 3000w pixels. But in terms of overall strength, he is not strong in that respect. On the other hand, his opponents are much better than 5d4 in these aspects.

3. At present, Sony A7R3 should be the leader in the micro-single field in Quan Huafu. No one. His image quality and various functions have exploded into Canon, and even 1DX2 has to bow before Sony.

In fact, Canon has a unique place on the lens, and its optical quality is also very good. Compared with Sony G Master, the price is also cheaper. It's just that Canon's fuselage technology is relatively backward, and the main thing that has been sprayed in terms of image quality is tolerance, but it's not bad for everyone. It's really much worse.

Summary: If you really like Canon, like Canon's system, and don't care so much about image quality and video, it is not bad to choose Canon 5D4. If you care more about video quality, high pixel, continuous shooting, low quality and high quality, and don't care about money, then choose Sony A7R3, and it will definitely give you a satisfactory picture.

For the comparison between Canon 5D4 and Sony A7R3, in fact, there is no comparability between the two products, one SLR and one micro-single, but both of them belong to two all-around machines that focus on high quality. Micro-singles are becoming more and more popular now, and there is a trend to replace SLR. Here, let's take a look at the specific differences and suggestions.

In fact, the appearance contrast of two completely different products is definitely very different, and the size and weight advantages of the micro-single we can expect are obvious. Looking at a top contrast, our prediction is self-evident.

Some friends may say that choosing a micro lens is small in size and good in portability, but if you look for a professional large ternary lens, this portability advantage may be gone …

In fact, we can also expect this, and the parameter party will definitely cheer for Sony's leading parameters. Let's briefly list Sony's comparative advantages:

Of course, Canon 5D4 can't be useless in terms of parameters. Actually, it's embarrassing SLR cameras only have traditional endurance advantages. In addition, low pixels and large unit pixel area are also advantages.

In fact, simple comparison parameters may sometimes be unfair compared with SLR. Canon 5D4 and Bisogni A7R3 were released one year earlier, and functions such as Bluetooth connection naturally disappeared.

In fact, the two machines I want to talk about are the two main housekeeping machines at present, and you can't go wrong with which one you choose. Which system you choose is which system you choose. Not only the contrast of the fuselage, but also the corresponding lens system should be considered. Here, if you choose Canon's system, there are almost 268 EF mount lenses to choose from, while Sony's E mount lens only has the choice of 10 1, which is not only a quasi-professional lens, but also some commonly used lenses, and the price is much more expensive. The budget must be carefully considered.

There is another problem. Canon doesn't have anti-shake. I don't know why Canon just missed the anti-shake of the fuselage. Two micro-single full-frame machines have been connected, but they still missed the anti-shake of the fuselage. According to Canon, the anti-shake effect of the lens is better, but if you are an anti-shake user, your choice of Canon lens will be reduced to 65 ... Sony users can use it at will.

I'm a sword dancer. Let me talk to you about photography.

Which should I choose, Canon 5d4 or Sony A7R3?

Many friends who bought new cameras are struggling with the choice of SLR and micro-single room. Actually, it's the right choice.

The following is just my idea:

If I buy Canon 5D4, this model of Canon is verified and used by a large number of photographers. Regardless of its advantages. In terms of quantity, it is definitely the most reliable mid-to high-end model of Canon at present. The most important thing is that Canon's lens group is huge, with various grades and prices. In addition, Canon's video shooting is also quite good. If you are interested in photography, you can choose Canon 5D4.

Sony A7R3

It is also the most important micro-single product, especially its video shooting has a good performance. If it is used for home travel, it is the right choice. Sony's lens group is worth considering. Compared with SLR, lenses with the same focal length and aperture are a bit expensive.

I hope you can choose a satisfactory camera.

I am a sword dance image, welcome to pay attention, let's exchange photos together.

It happens that both cameras are equipped with 24-70 cameras.

I read a lot of comments about going straight to color Canon seconds Sony and Sony's short battery life.

In my opinion, picking a camera should start with the demand.

Only the most suitable is not the best.

I won't talk about the professional parameter introduction. I am obsessed with these two machines, and the parameter estimation has been rummaged through.

Strictly speaking, 5D4 and R3 can no longer be compared on the same level, and the parameter R3 completely crushes 5D4.

I have been persuading you to use my two machines separately for half a year.

Choose 5D4 for pure plane shooting.

Choose A7R3 for both video and plane.

One thing to remind, if you often shoot stars, you must not choose Sony, because Sony will eat stars.