Want to shoot birds, buy the right horse 150-600 or Canon 100-400? Can you give me some advice?

First of all, in a broad sense, these two lenses are suitable for shooting birds and belong to telephoto lenses. If there is a fine division of labor, there are still some differences. If you want to know more, please walk into the following with me.

1. Let's start with Canon 100-400. This lens, commonly known as Canon White Rabbit, is divided into two types. Canon Dabai's first generation of relatively cheap telephoto lens was produced in the late 1990s, which is a lens with excellent imaging and high reputation. In the original telephoto red circle, the cost performance is very high, and it is a portable bird killing tool. Compared with the first generation, the second generation mainly changed the zoom mode (push-pull and rotation), usm focus motor and anti-shake, and improved the image quality (especially the edge of the image quality).

Let's talk about Yima's 150-600. This lens is also divided into two versions, one is the C version and the other is the S version, which is what we call the sport version. Both were released at the same time on 20 14. Compared with the two Sigma super telephoto lenses, the aperture and weight of the S version are larger than those of the C version, so you have to use a tripod to use them. If you want to hit the bird with your hand, save it.

3. How about two images? (To be exact, it should be four, each lens has two models, and Sigma has an older one 150600, so I won't say it here). The first generation of great white center imaging is perfect, the edge is slightly worse, the focusing speed is acceptable in noise speed accuracy, and there is no obvious difference in full focus imaging. The second generation of Dabai focuses quickly and quietly, which means that it can hit anywhere, with higher accuracy and more balanced image quality (especially the gap between the edge and the center is very small), which is perfect.

The focus of Sigma C version 156 is basically the same as that of Dabai generation, and the imaging sharpness is somewhat different from that of Dabai generation, but it is not obvious. That is, the focal length imaging above 400 drops quickly, the noise increases, and it is slightly tasteless. Although the configuration of the S version in terms of aperture entrance and lens group is higher than that of the C version, the picture quality and clarity are also improved to some extent compared with the C version, but there is still a slight gap compared with the Dabai II version.

To sum up, if your bird catching environment can be solved within 400mm focal length, it is recommended to go to Dabai, which one should be seen clearly. If your 400mm focal length environment is not enough or far from enough, then you should consider whether to go to Yima 156. Which one is it, or the above sentence: look at your own pocket. In addition, even if the focal length of 400 is a little hard, you can get good picture quality and effect if you cut it a little later.

Of course, everyone will have their own opinions on this issue. As the saying goes, different people have different opinions. I am a photographer who has owned and used these four lenses successively. These are my views and experiences on this issue. I hope it can help photographers and friends. Welcome to pay attention and leave a message. Let's study, discuss and grow together. I'll give you some bird pictures of Canon Dabai and Sigma 156. I am an old fish swimming in the clouds. Goodbye!

How to choose Sagittarius 150-600mmf/5-6.3 and Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6? Judging from the shooting theme alone, of course, the price of bird shooting is relatively high. Sigma 150-600mmf5-6.3. This shot is currently recognized as a bird shooting magic in the circle.

Here I want to analyze from two points:

1. If you confirm that you will only shoot birds or sports in the future, this shot is correct. This kind of lens has extremely high optical quality. It uses two fluorite FLD low dispersion lenses and three SLD special low dispersion lenses to correct the chromatic aberration to the maximum extent. Through the use of low dispersion lens and the effective configuration of lens structure, ultra-high image quality can be achieved in the full focal length range. In order to give better consideration to actual combat and durability, the lens body is made of a large number of metal materials, which is enough to cope with various harsh and complicated shooting environments. The aperture of the filter reaches 105mm, and the lens adopts 16 group of 24 optical structures, consisting of 9 apertures, which supports optical image stabilization and focus limitation, and has the characteristics of dust prevention and splash prevention. The outermost lens is also coated with hydrophobic anti-pollution coating, which is very suitable for field shooting. It is a very good telephoto lens.

2. If it's just a temporary pat for fun, and then you may choose other shooting subjects, then choose Canon100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS II USM. In the coating technology of this lens, in addition to antifouling fluorine coating, the last lens group also adopts a brand-new ASC Air Sphere coating technology, which can greatly suppress glare and ghosts and improve image quality. The newly designed 16 and 2 1 lens groups, including a fluorite lens and a super UD lens, can effectively suppress and correct various chromatic aberrations. The resolution of this lens 100mm full aperture is quite excellent. It can be seen that it is very close to the optimal aperture, and the overall resolution can be maintained to F 16. At the 400mm end, although the full aperture has decreased, the overall value is still excellent. Overall, the resolution performance of this lens has been very stable, and the resolution performance of each aperture is not far from the best aperture, which is very suitable for daily shooting.

Although the 400mm bird shooting is slightly shorter than the 600mm of Sigma, it will be much more practical to shoot other subjects in the future than150-600 mm.

My suggestion is to buy the S version of Yima 150-600mm lens. Friends around me also bought Canon 100-400 white a few years ago, which can shoot big birds, but not enough birds, so many subjects can't adapt. Last year, they bought 150-600 lens, Yima 150-6000. Compared with the price of Jiao Da whitehead set by Canon 600, the price of Sigma S version is only a fraction. Considering the comprehensive cost performance and superior usability, it is most desirable to purchase the 150-600s version. Be patient when shooting birds. Wait slowly. It's best to put the camera on the shelf. You won't get tired after waiting for a long time.

The above is just my personal opinion, for reference only. Everyone has their own requirements for the scope of application of the equipment. Some people buy 100-400 to shoot birds, but most of them have other uses. If you prefer to shoot birds, then choose 150-600 lens in between.

Canon 00 1 1400 Well, what do you think of my bird?

Canon 100-400

I use Canon 100-400 lens. Compared with Sigma 150-600 lens, I still think 140 is better. First, 140 is light; Second, the focus is better; Thirdly, under the same lighting conditions, the noise is weaker than that of Sigma 150.

100/400 is preferred. The main reasons are: first, the imaging quality is good; Second, it is lighter.

Want to shoot birds, buy the right horse 150-600 or Canon 100-400? Can you give me some advice? From the angle of bird shooting alone, the longer the focal length, the better, so it is better to choose Sigma 150-600.

Canon's 100-400 will be more perfect in shooting quality and imaging quality.

Canon's Dabai, the Canon 100-400 lens in the title, is an excellent lens with good image quality, fast focusing speed and relatively soft Jiao Wai. Many Canon users also use it to take pictures of flowers and portraits, and of course, to take pictures of scenery. If it is a relatively close bird, this shot can also be taken perfectly, but birds in life are generally far away and alert, so use big white.

From the focal length, Sigma's 150-600 lens is more suitable for shooting bird ecology. This lens is also used by many bird photographers. After all, most friends can't afford expensive long fixed-focus lenses. It can be said that this lens is also very cost-effective. There are two versions of Sigma's 150-600. You can choose according to your own budget. Of course, the S version of the sports version is better and more expensive in shooting bird ecology, while the C version is a bird-catching lens specially made for beginners, which can completely solve the problem of shooting and not shooting.

The above is my opinion, welcome friends to exchange.

Sword dance images, western photographers, welcome to pay attention.

If the bird shooting environment is superior, and they are all big birds of egrets, you should buy Dabaier first, otherwise it is the 150-600S version, with good picture quality.