vivoX80Pro competes with a 10,000-yuan mirrorless camera. Although it still has shortcomings, it has shown a counterattack trend.

We often see at mobile phone launch conferences that the host says that his mobile phone is comparable to a SLR, intending to praise his mobile phone's particularly powerful photography capabilities. But in fact, everyone who knows the industry knows that mobile phone photography depends more on computing power, while professional SLRs rely on sensors and lenses.

So what is the gap between professional SLRs and top-level imaging flagships? Today, let’s compare the vivoX80Pro with the Sony Alpha7III full-frame mirrorless camera, which sells for over 10,000 yuan.

Comparing the first photo, we can see that although the vivoX80Pro on the left also has blur, it has obvious flaws. The photo taken by the Sony Alpha7III on the right is well blurred and the picture has a more layered feel.

The comparison of the second close-up photo is still the same. In the face of a more complex scene, the blur of the vivoX80Pro on the left is directly exposed. With its powerful computational photography capabilities, it still fails to show the ultimate picture effect. The blur on the right Sony Alpha7III is still great.

If you zoom in on the close-up photos taken, you can see the obvious difference. The vivoX80Pro picture on the left is already quite blurry, and there are flaws in the blur. On the other hand, the enlarged picture of Sony Alpha7III on the right is still clearly visible and the blur effect is excellent.

In the comparison of long-range photos, with the power of computational photography, the color of the vivoX80Pro on the left is more pleasing, the picture saturation is higher, and the sky and buildings are bluer. The Sony Alpha7III on the right is closer to real colors and has more picture details.

vivoX80Pro supports 60x digital zoom. Comparing the Sony Alpha7III, we can find that the picture effect of the vivoX80Pro on the left is extremely poor, with obvious sharpening marks and a strong smearing effect. On the other hand, looking at the picture of Sony Alpha7III on the right, there is no trace of sharpening or smearing, and the picture is still clear.

For night scene photography comparison, for the sake of fairness, Sony Alpha7III uses automatic mode and is handheld shooting. Through comparison, we can find that the highlight suppression of vivoX80Pro on the left is better. At first glance, the picture is better than Sony Alpha7III, but if you look carefully You can see that there is still noise in the sky.

When the night scene photos are enlarged and viewed, the shortcomings of vivoX80Pro are instantly revealed. The buildings have obvious sharpening marks and the light is too stiff. Although Sony Alpha7III's highlight suppression is not in place in automatic mode, the picture is clear without any signs of sharpening, and the lighting is also very soft.

Through comparison, we can find that mobile phones are not completely comparable to professional SLRs yet, but they are popular in some aspects. For example, after pressing the shutter, you can directly get a photo with pleasing colors and balanced brightness control. Photos, all thanks to the computational photography capabilities of mobile phones. SLRs are more suitable for high-end photography players. In terms of blur, resolution, dynamic range, etc., SLRs still have huge advantages.