About 70-200 f4 is with Canon SLR.

First of all, I hope the landlord knows a little about the basic knowledge of lens focal length photography. The two collocations involved in your question are not comparable at all. Then I will help the landlord analyze it according to my own experience.

First of all, apart from the lens, the positioning of the 600-D and 60d fuselage itself is slightly different. Individuals with a budget of more than 10,000 yuan prefer the 600-D body, because the price difference between the two bodies is not very big, and the money saved by entering the 600-D is not enough to upgrade your lens to a higher level, and many parameters of the 60d are not shaken in front of the Canon C format machine 7d, which is very cost-effective.

Secondly, in terms of lens, I don't know what the landlord said about the first collocation. As an ordinary SLR enthusiast, there is no demand for bird shooting, paparazzi and sports photography. The focal length of real high frequency is actually around 18- 100, and telephoto is rarely used. I like Guo Xuwei. Although it only has f4 aperture, it has the advantages of telephoto end and high definition of imaging. Although its composition and depth of field control are not as convenient as 50mm 1.8 when shooting portraits, its performance is by no means inferior to 50mm 1.8 (after all, it is the most elementary fixed focus, and there is really nothing to say about imaging). If the landlord uses telephoto extensively and occasionally takes portraits, you can consider loving only Guo Xuwei without spending 50 yuan. Although it is not expensive, it can save money. The second choice really belongs to lazy people, which is convenient for a mirror to travel around the world. If the landlord doesn't pursue upgrading in the future, it doesn't hurt to buy this one, but the imaging is much worse than that in Guo Xuwei, but it's a little worse because of its wide coverage and convenient street sweeping. The third 60d+24- 105, the first 24- 105 or 24-70, has no wide-angle advantage when used on a C-frame machine, which is a pity for individuals who are on business trips or something. Secondly, personally, lens 24- 105 is not very important. Although it is a red circle, its performance is somewhat disappointing. As a zoom lens, there is no wide-angle advantage in C frame, and the focal length of 15-85 covers and contains a wide angle. The imaging of 17-55 does not belong to it, which makes this lens very uncomfortable. The whole machine is sold as 5d2 sets, and most 5d2 users are not satisfied with its performance, so they buy 24-70 or 16 instead.

To sum up, the landlord's three schemes are not very suitable.

If you have a budget of 1w or so.

I recommend the 60d body and one of the three lenses, 17-85, 15-85, 17-55.

17-85 is sold as a set of machines, and the focal length is also very common. The lens quality is not very good, but it is still good compared with 18- 135. You can consider buying 50mm 1.8 or a tripod for the rest of the money.

15-85, as a 7-day lens, has the largest wide-angle end in the zoom lens, reaching 15mm, covering the commonly used focal length. The imaging quality of the lens is also better than that of 17-85, and it is the highest recommended one when the budget allows.

17-55 as the mirror king of C-picture, the imaging quality is not damaged at all. Although it is not as good as the red circle, it is not bad. The disadvantage is that the focal length coverage is a little less, and the external zoom is used. Some people call it a "vacuum cleaner" on the Internet, but as far as I've been using it for nearly a year, I haven't found any dust problems. The only thing that makes me uncomfortable is that this lens is heavy and there is no lock, so the lens rushes down.

No matter which lens, the landlord can add 50mm 1.8 if anyone wants it. No big deal.

PS:

Four shots of 1 70-200 all adopt internal zoom technology, so it won't zoom when zooming.

I don't understand why people always recommend invincible rabbit. Yes, invincible rabbit is a good camera, but how is the budget of 1w possible? The fuselage cost more than 10 thousand, plus the lens, memory card uv mirror and other accessories more than 20 thousand, it is very easy, it is unreasonable to double the budget recommendation of others for no reason. In addition, as you know, all clothes are not necessarily good, and everyone knows how fast digital products are updated. Investing in cameras is far less than investing in lenses. The landlord can ask the senior photographers around him or online that there are not many favorite lenses, and the cameras have changed a lot but those lenses are still in use. To say the least, even if you get the full picture in a few years, it doesn't mean you have to sell the C-picture camera. More photographers will choose multiple cameras instead of one camera. After all, the free telephoto brought by the multiplication coefficient of C graph is equally attractive.