Where is the "objective" in the objective reflection theory of dialectical materialist epistemology?

The "objective" in the theory of objective reflection in dialectical materialist epistemology requires three aspects for reflection: the form of consciousness reflection, the process of consciousness reflection, and the deterministic correspondence between the content of consciousness reflection and the object process. Let’s think about these three aspects:

The meaning of the reflection theory of “reproduction, photography” expressed by Lenin is that if the form of reflection is constructed, and the content and information of reflection are objective and real, then this The viewpoint is consistent with the viewpoint of dialectical materialism that "the form of consciousness is subjective, while the content of consciousness is objective and is a subjective reflection of objective reality." However, such a viewpoint does not conform to people's actual practical processes and scientific principles. of. Because the colors, sounds, and entities reflected by our consciousness do not exist in objective reality; and if dialectical materialism admits that human consciousness constructs the reflected content and information of objects, then it may be equivalent to admitting that people cannot If one realizes the existence content of objective things through the reflection of "copying and photography", then the foundation of materialism will be somewhat shaken.

If the cognitive reflection theory of dialectical materialism admits that people's reflections on objects are constructed from both form and content, then there will be no "reproduction, photography" reflection, however. Another point that can support its objective reflection theory is that there is a deterministic correspondence between the reflection content of the construction of objects by consciousness and the objective raw materials. For example, we will say that the cup entity is the content reflected by the construction. It can be said that there is a deterministic correspondence between the cup entity and the molecule set. Therefore, people's reflected content of the cup is objective; however, people will continue to ask: Molecules are also the content reflected in the construction of consciousness. It can be said that there is a deterministic correspondence between molecules and atoms. Therefore, people’s reflections on molecules are objective. Therefore, we need to continue to trace the microscopic aspects to the basic particles. Here, people's constructive reflection of quantum states is unpredictable and random, so what is the objective material for the content of quantum states' constructive reflections? How to correspond? Are the corresponding properties and forms certain? Dialectical materialism is no longer able to answer. Therefore, when it came to quantum mechanics, people discovered the deterministic correspondence between the reflection theory of dialectical materialism and the objective raw materials, which people had not recognized. Therefore, the objective foundation of the cognitive content of dialectical materialism has been completely shaken.

Looking back, people made new reflections on the process of cognition, and then realized that what they recognized was the unity of the interaction between subject and object, and cognition phenomena. All deterministic correspondences are correspondences between different phenomena of objects that people understand under different conditions, rather than deterministic correspondences between phenomena and the objective.

Therefore, the "objective" in dialectical materialist epistemology should be the "thing in itself" that supports the phenomena people understand and is outside the content of understanding. But people do not realize its content. What they realize is the unity of the interaction between subject and object: the cognitive content of the "humanized world", a cognitive phenomenon, but they do not realize objective things and objective truth. of.

Where is the "objective" in the objective reflection theory of dialectical materialist epistemology?