Short video infringement needs to be rectified urgently. Is short video editing a serious problem?

I think it's quite serious. Because the content of short video infringement is also done by some people to make money. No matter who bought the content in the end, I hope I can use it to gain value. It is not appropriate for producers and buyers to use short videos directly without paying.

The topic of short video infringement once became a hot topic on the Internet. The party who advocates his own rights thinks that the producer of short video has no right to use his own video content to obtain click-through rate and other benefits. The producers of short videos think that the platform should not restrict users' right to use videos.

In this matter, I will feel that the content of some short videos is indeed infringing. To give a simple example, for example, a car manufacturer built a car and sold it to Zhang San. He wanted to use this car to run a taxi and earn some income for himself. But Zhang San's relatives and friends told him to lend me your car when you are not using it. I also want to make money with it. As a result, Zhang San's car became the common property of countless relatives and friends, and Zhang San's own income was also affected.

This example may not be appropriate, but what I want to say is that we can treat the content of the video as a commodity. Producers are producers of commodities. The video platform is the dealer after buying the goods. It is really inappropriate for short video writers to bring dealers' things for free. In the long run, neither dealers nor manufacturers are willing to continue to manufacture and sell excellent products. The whole industry will be affected.

To put it simply, producers shoot film and television dramas to sell money, and video platforms spend a lot of money to broadcast them, but also to make money. It is Bai Piao's behavior to shoot the short video for free, which infringes upon the interests of others.

Strengthening copyright awareness Some people think that the author of short video is innocent. I think the main reason is that copyright awareness is not strong. For example, if you take someone else's cake, you will have a rough estimate in your mind and feel more or less grateful for how much this cake is worth.

But if you ask a photographer friend to take a picture for you, you may think that he is just pointing his finger and is not worth mentioning. In fact, whether it is cake, time, technology or video works, it is a way for some people to exchange rewards. It doesn't mean that just because we think he is worthless, he is really worthless and can be used for free. Everyone has the right to safeguard his own interests. When you take countless cakes from others, others will naturally feel uncomfortable. Similarly, video producers and buyers will feel uncomfortable.

It takes a process to remember a long time ago, when online novels just began to spread, free resources were everywhere at that time. However, as the industry becomes more and more standardized, we gradually accept the mode of spending money on reading novels.

You can think that this is not worth mentioning, and even think that you have the right to publish novels after spending money. However, this kind of behavior will infringe on the author's interests. In the long run, no one will be willing to spend time creating high-quality works. Therefore, I think that short video infringement is more serious, which needs effective laws and regulations to regulate, but it needs a process for everyone to adapt.