Roaming content in photography

There are too many such low-level reasons. Nikon's adoption of ccd and coms provided by Sony is well known in the world.

On the machine, Sony α550 is better than Nikon D3 100 and D5000.

1 Nikon system machine, the higher the end, the more practical it is. At least choose Nikon from the D90, because there is no body motor below the D90, and many Nikon lenses have no motors themselves, which means that many classic old men will not use them in the future, and you have to spend more money to buy lenses with focus motors.

If you are going to buy a mid-range machine such as D90 or D7000, Nikon is good, but if you get started, Sony's entry machine is still good. Recommend Sony α580. With 16- 105 or 16-80za Zeiss lens, it should be enough for the first two years, and the fuselage performance is good.

As for the picture quality, there is no standard problem. Some people resent Canon's lack of sharpness. Some people say that Nikon's picture quality is yellow, and some people say that Sony is not good. But if you really choose the machine, you have to put aside the interference of the brand. In such a big venue as Canon, there is also the problem of losing the reflector. It's not who has more markets or whose products are better. Go to the store to touch, see and ask familiar people. At least I have used Nikon and Sony, and my feeling is that each has its own advantages, depending on what you require. I like the color of the picture, and I feel that Sony and Zeiss have a good combination.