Is it true that America landed on the moon?

Anyone who believes in the landlord's point of view will believe it.

1, melatonin advertisement,

2. Netease advertising,

3, infatuated with Sister Furong

I don't know how many times this cold rice has been fried.

Over and over again, only a few chapters of evidence and photos, just a few reasons. Moreover, those who have a little knowledge of photography in the chapters know what the problem is.

There is a lot of information on the internet, libraries and society to prove that landing on the moon is true.

For those who would rather believe those photos than a dime a dozen information, there is no reason to talk about it, and there is no need to talk about it.

So I'm not going to talk about those chapters.

I just want to say that you all know the evolution of this rumor.

It was Americans who first took photos of those chapters, and rumors first appeared in the 1970s. The national aeronautics and space administration of the United States dismissed this, but it became more and more serious, and many people agreed with this person's point of view.

1978, Hollywood shot Capricorn I alluded to this view. Of course, there is also a saying that Capricorn I is the reason for the rumor of landing on the moon.

By the 1990s, these guys were getting bigger and bigger. I started shooting TV to prove it. A "man of insight" asked Armstrong to take an oath in front of the camera according to the Bible. Said the moon landing was real, but it was held by a 60-year-old man. NASA began to notice this and stepped forward to avoid rumors.

Now the same photo, the same reason. Now it has become a problem for a Russian big bowl scientist. It is estimated that Indian wizards, African chiefs, Arab princes and European vampire nobles will also talk about this in the future.

It's like the advertisement for melatonin is disgusting, and someone buys it.

Netease claims that 1000 yuan is better than tens of thousands of cameras from Nikon and Canon, and some people believe it.

Sister Furong is still sought after.

And these people are not in the minority. Therefore, the topic of moon landing fraud will continue, and those chapters of photos are estimated to be the most concerned scientific and technological materials.

Apollo spacecraft 12- 17 From1969165438+10 to1972 65438+February, the United States launched Apollo/. Among them, except for Apollo 13, which was suspended due to the explosion of the liquid oxygen tank in the service cabin (two astronauts returned to the ground safely in the spaceship), * * * 12 astronauts all successfully landed on the moon.

The moon landing scam is now a Russian version.

After that, there will be African Chieftain Edition, Indian Wizard Edition, Arabian Prince Edition, European Vampire Noble Edition and so on.

You are still very young. China will land on the moon after 2020, so his descendants will have a chance to discuss the differences between the African chiefs' version, the Indian wizards' version, the Arab princes' version, the European vampire aristocrats' version and the Russian version.

You can proudly boast to your son and grandson. When I was in elementary school, your father saw from those photos that Americans were unreliable. If your son was half as clever as your father, he would have made a fortune.

Many people in the back still believe in photos. It seems that science popularization really has a long way to go.

Let me explain the problem of photos.

1. The Stars and Stripes are flying. Please look at the photos carefully. There is a crossbar on the top of the flag. What can I say about this observation?

2. You can't see the stars. Do you know what underexposure means? Very basic knowledge of photography, tutor is recommended.

3, the shadow problem, first, the ground is uneven, second, how the shadow is inconsistent, say something specific, pay attention to careful observation. I guess it's not specific. When I was in college, I got 98 points in descriptive geometry, and I didn't see any problems. )

4. It's even funnier that there is no astronaut landing in the film. Each landing site is different, and someone or an automaton must wait for the registered film at the landing site first. The quality of the person who asked this question is really good.

There are many reasons that affect the speed of an object, not only the acceleration of gravity, but also the relationship between force and acceleration is square. This problem can only be understood by junior high school physics.

Questioning the moon landing has the following views.

1, Saturn 5, so why don't you use NB now? It seems that this car is a truck with only 10 tons. The car is not needed. Send the children to kindergarten and drive a big truck. Saturn V's launch capacity in low earth orbit is as high as 120 tons, and now the satellite weight is only 10 tons. Burning money is not the way.

Saturn V mysteriously disappeared after landing on the moon and was never used again. These paintings were also mysteriously destroyed in the cleaning of NASA. Ha ha, can only say that the rumor monger is shameless. Skylab was launched by Saturn V on May 1973, US time. Its orbital height is 430 kilometers, its shape is cylindrical, its length is 35 meters, its diameter is 7 meters and its weight is about 77.5 tons. July 1979 crashed.

The entity of Saturn V is still preserved at the Kennedy Space Center and is open for visit. People who have friends in America can go and have a look.

Since 1969 can go to the moon, 30 years have passed now, and no one else has been there. It's simple. No one made land for the business that lost money. Apollo program cost $25 billion, 1960 was $25 billion, and 1960 US GDP reached $500 billion.

It was impossible to land on the moon with science and technology 30 years ago. Similarly, the Egyptian pyramid of khufu, built in 2560 BC, is 146 meters high. The buildings that reached this height in Europe were built on the spires of churches around AD 1400. So it is impossible for the Egyptians to build such a high pyramid in 2560 BC.

Some people say that my quality is poor and I don't respect other people's opinions. Just short.

But it's just a few vague photos, which are as picky as amateurs and don't look carefully But I don't want to use "pineapple plan" as a keyword to search. Is the quality high?

The European "SMART- 1" spacecraft that verified the truth of landing on the moon was launched in 2005 and entered the high orbit of the moon. Preliminary photos have been obtained. But it is of great significance, and European space is inconclusive. It has been stated that it will never release any information. The probe will be launched from the moon's ultra-low orbit in August 2006, and landed at Jinghai coordinates: 0.7 1 degree north latitude and 23.63 degrees east longitude that year.

Therefore, astronomers propose to use the latest and most powerful astronomical telescope (VLT) in the world to detect whether there is a lunar landing vehicle left over from the Apollo moon landing program.

At present, V LT stands in the Andes of Chile and consists of four parts. /kloc-a hair 0/6 kilometers away, it can be seen clearly. If Americans do land on the moon, astronomers will be able to see a rough image of the lunar module left on the surface of the moon by using V LT, and the rover needs further exploration.

You could say that. NASA doesn't need to spend a lot of money to prove this. They said they would return to the moon in 20 18. You know, not just for fun, but after the completion of the construction of the International Space Station. Establish a permanent base on the moon so that rockets can be launched from the moon to further places. And it is important to develop helium 3 into a new generation of nuclear fission power generation, and even make more powerful bombs! !

Also, when I landed on the moon, I left a plaque carved with stainless steel plate on the moon. Now NASA can even get spirits and opportunities on Mars. If the facts really need to be confirmed and the whole world wants to confirm them, it is said that the whole world wants to confirm them. Each person donates 10 USD, and 6 billion people are 60 billion USD. Please ask NASA to build Saturn 5 carrier rocket and spacecraft or detector.

However, the state funds come from taxpayers, and there is absolutely no need to do an aimless space race. It was only because of the cold war that I landed on the moon.

If everyone donates now. Tell him to rebuild Saturn V rocket. Make another probe with the spirit rover and launch it to the moon with Saturn 5. Then carefully check whether the stainless steel plaque is still in the original coordinates.

If the plaque is there, Then everything will be clear

All the remarks are self-defeating, and all the legends against going to the moon have been shattered by themselves.

Facts are the only criterion for testing truth! ! !

Moreover, you must pay attention to the evidence when you speak. Pay attention to science! ! !

It's boring to say it. That's good. Whether it's fake or not. The facts will come out one day. Or China will have a detector one day. Look at the original coordinates and see if there is a plaque. If there is. I think the person who wrote this book is probably despised. . . .

Now America is against the moon. The only purpose is to develop helium 3, a severely fissionable element. If bombs are made, the same mass of 1 helium bomb is not less than 100 hydrogen bombs or 200 atomic bombs! ! ! !

In terms of power generation, helium 3 has an almost infinite service life, and it hardly needs to replace the fuel rod, which can provide unlimited power for the earth! !

Just like it said above. At present, Shenzhou 5 has only 10 tons. Is Saturn V also used for 10 tons or more?

There is also. Without Saturn V, the world's largest sports platform, the tracked rocket transport vehicle (launching platform) and the A B (lunar harbor launcher) on the 39 th were all made by the United States at a cost of hundreds of millions of yuan.

These are the most advanced in the world, and there are facilities in the assembly building to provide four Saturn V devices for simultaneous assembly. This still needs to be doubted?

As for the exposure and heat resistance of the film

You know that. At that time, it seemed that China didn't even have a few TVs.

Photos. At that time, the highest was a German film, which went into space. Photosensitive materials must be dedicated, and film is no exception.

And they also brought a video camera (black and white. It's also from the German film company, but it's related.

Why can't you see shadows and stars? The shadow is long and changeable, and people don't know if they have tried it.

Under natural light conditions. Use a wide-angle lens (with large curvature) and then two people stand in different places to shoot. What's the photo that came out?

It seems that the shadow is different. But now it is 2 1 century. Or do you experiment by yourself? Still fake? wordless

If the stars see it, I don't think this person can see it.

You can try it like this. Put a kite or balloon in the sky with the standard photosensitive film of light angle lens.

(Facing the sun) Then the camera lens is facing the sun, shooting the sensitivity in night shooting mode (the aperture is at the maximum position) and then shooting the position of the balloon sun.

Balloon is a star, and the sun is a strong light source, because it is on the moon. The sun is unusually strong)

The film was finally released. There is nothing in the photo. What happened?

Then shoot it again in strong light mode (minimum aperture), when the balloon is far away (probably when the stars are big and small to the naked eye). As a result, the balloon disappeared, the sun became dark, and the sky was dark blue (from the earth's point of view, the moon should be dark), so that you could barely see some objects on the Chu light source, otherwise it would be overexposed and all the photos would be useless!

As for the two people on the camera, Armstrong actually put a camera next to the stairs when he went down to the second step of the stairs, which completely photographed the whole process of landing on the moon.

Moreover, during the four-hour mission, there were countless dynamic shots, just for the convenience of publicity, so some representative pictures were released and two were released at the same time.

This can be completely explained. It seems that people who say they don't believe it. It's really stupid

According to the real society, I will make one point more clear than the author of the above article.

Saturn V is like a heavy bulldozer (it seems to have about 7,000 horsepower, which can easily knock down houses) [it takes billions to launch].

Then the Long March II rocket is like a car.

Satellites are like hundreds of kilograms of goods.

If it were you. Who would you choose?

Are you just going shopping and driving this 7,000-power bulldozer? Flourishing, 1 min is more fuel efficient than your car 1 hour.

If Saturn V is on board, Saturn V has five engines (and it burns continuously without restraint), and it needs to be filled with 2,700 tons of aviation kerosene (first class), liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen (second and third classes).

If it is China. . Would you like to? Launching Saturn V 1 time is more expensive than launching the space shuttle n times. Launching other rockets costs 1: NNN, if it is you. Who do you choose?

This is an easy truth to understand.

You can check the information first. I got a very, very unsolvable answer before asking.

Otherwise, if someone asks one day. Why do lights use electricity?

I think these people are just like the people who wrote the moon landing scam.

Why do lights need electricity? = = = The man who cheated on the moon.

Because generating heat energy requires current potential difference, when it reaches a certain k number, the visible spectrum can appear in his electromagnetic wave. So as to emit light [from the perspective of physical quantum theory] = = = = = = experts from NASA and the aerospace industry.

This is the theory.

The world now. For your own reputation. Too much nonsense. 199 1 After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the United States became more and more developed.

That's the reason.

Please believe in science. Believe in truth. When the European probe lands again in August 2006, it will surely find this plaque. At this time, all the truth must be presented to everyone! !

You know that. Paper can't wrap fire, and real gold is not afraid of fire.

As long as you have been there. There is no need to comment. The world will know sooner or later! !

As for the existence of Saturn 5.

At present, there is a Saturn 5 rocket made by 1970 at Kennedy Space Center, and all the designs are the same as those when landing on the moon. It's just that there is something wrong with the fuel tank inside this rocket. So 1970 must have been modified, but it was not modified in the end, so it was preserved. A certain * * * made 1 1 shelf Saturn 5 in America. Among them, 10 is online!

You can go to Kennedy Space Center to see if it is Saturn 5. If you have money. You can pay him to repair it and then shoot anything to the moon. Look at the power of Saturn V! !

The world's largest rocket has a total tonnage of 5,780 tons, which is more than 20 tons larger than that of the Soviet Union. It can send dozens of tons of goods to the moon and hundreds of tons of goods to low-earth orbit.

Apollo spacecraft 12- 17 From1969165438+10 to1972 65438+February, the United States launched Apollo/. Among them, except for Apollo 13, which was suspended due to the explosion of the liquid oxygen tank in the service cabin (two astronauts returned to the ground safely in the spaceship), * * * 12 astronauts all successfully landed on the moon.

Do you see it? Armstrong was only the first man to land on the moon. Not the last one! ! ! ! Chase them. Saturn V was launched 10 times until 1972, when the United States decided that it was not worth developing the space shuttle and space station. So I terminated the plan. Saturn 5 is also idle!

Brought back 22 kilograms of specimens. These non-earth specimens have been recognized all over the world. And it contains helium 3, so it proves to be from the moon! Since there are specimens. It can explain everything!

The Apollo manned moon landing project in the United States has never failed. In Apollo 13, the command center requested to clean the oxygen cylinders. And the circuit is short-circuited. Causing the oxygen tank to rupture. The great pressure of the compressed gas cylinder urges the gas to be ejected from the propulsion cabin. As a result, the pressure is too high and the shell of the propulsion cabin is broken. (If you have a chance, you can go to see the movie Apollo 13, which was shot under the command of NASA. The process of completely recreating Apollo 13)

This is my comment. Thank you!