Are the comments in Zhihu reliable and the answers in Zhihu reliable?

Is it reliable to mention the comments in Zhihu? As we all know, Zhihu was asked if the answer was reliable. In addition, some people want to ask the comments of many people in Zhihu, why there is no infringement? Do you know what this is about? In fact, are people on Zhihu reliable? Let's take a look at Zhihu's answer. I hope I can help you!

Are the comments on Zhihu reliable?

1. Are the comments on Zhihu reliable? Is the answer on Zhihu reliable? In fact, it is a subjective answer to the question whether it is reliable or not, because there is only one in Zhihu. On the whole, it can't control the quality of content that isn't produced by itself, and many answers in Zhihu are subjective questions, so some questions may be useful in some people's eyes, but they are useless in some people's eyes, depending on whether you are reliable or not. Either way, there will be no phenomenon of only good and no bad. As long as it is edited by others, the quality of this post is certainly difficult to guarantee. No matter what kind of news media or personal official WeChat account, it will be "unreliable". I felt a lot of negative energy on Zhihu.

And as far as the current software push mechanism is concerned, most of what you see comes from what you usually pay attention to and observe, so what you see is actually what you want to see, or what you often see. And Zhihu, we can't deny that he can teach people a lot by spreading some knowledge, but it still has various mixed phenomena. As a software, he said that the above content can't be% correct, no matter who dares to make such a guarantee. So it is necessary for us to judge whether the content shown above is good or bad, because at present, many people in Zhihu are promoting themselves in various ways, so when publishing articles, it is very likely that the content he posted is biased, for example, his main function is to drain himself, and he actually wants to achieve a certain goal in the process of answering questions, but we can't think that the answer in this case is bad. Moreover, some people are purely voluntary in the process of answering questions, and there are many such answers. We can't think that this unprofitable voluntary answer is necessarily good. We can only say that Zhihu does have a lot of content in all aspects, and the authenticity of the content, the quality of his answer, and whether it is reliable information need to be judged by ourselves. Analysis of user groups in Zhihu in 2020.

2. Are the comments on Zhihu reliable? There are many people's comments on Zhihu. Why is there no infringement? One is that no one complains, and the other is that there is no management, because some places need heating. If comments are forbidden, then the survival of the website is problematic.

3. Are the comments on Zhihu reliable? Are the people on Zhihu reliable? Zhihu has always advertised itself as a "real online Q&A community with a friendly and rational atmosphere, connecting elites from all walks of life. Users share each other's professional knowledge, experience and insights, and constantly provide high-quality information for the China Internet. " However, this time at the Zhihu, it was revealed that "One Pirate-Wang" appeared alone, which really shocked the people who ate melons.

Zhihu's hypocrisy has long been discovered by netizens. On June 5438+ 10, 2008, an article entitled "Zhihu's Evil and My Complaint History" was published by Longmen Array of Sanmiao from the media, criticizing Zhihu's incorrect values and ignoring personal attacks or remarks, such as hammer CTO Pool, CTO in front of the park and Sanmiao himself as "Sohu's dog", and even conniving at them to some extent. The article says that human nature has its evil side. If a person ignores and indulges it instead of guiding and limiting it, what you can expect is that it will die as soon as possible.

Zhihu's values aside, Zhihu's lack is also a fact. Around June, 2006, ck Xiaoxiao, a user in Zhihu, posted a post, claiming that she was a female college student, suffering from congenital heart disease, failed in surgery, could not live without love, and did not want to continue to rely on life. "ck Xiaoxiao" published itself and accepted donations from netizens. Zhihu v "Tanya" immediately recommended this article, saying that she went to see "ck Xiaoxiao", hoping that everyone would raise money for it. After investigation by Suzhou police, ck Xiaoxiao's real identity is Anhui innocent man Tong Mou, who is the same person as Tan Ya.

Are the people on Zhihu reliable? According to Tong's account after he arrived at the case, he first registered two online accounts, Xiaoyan and Tan Ya, on Zhihu, and posted and replied to posts such as "What kind of experience is a girlfriend" and "What kind of experience is a childhood friend", stealing Weibo photos of other netizens as avatars, fictional "Tan Ya", a beautiful and intellectual female image full of positive energy, and shaping "Tan Ya" into.

Whether a person plays a role or Zhihu cheats on donations, it is said that Zhihu is not a "real community" as advertised, but lacks connections. In Zhihu, there are life attacks almost every day. A netizen complained to Zhihu because the company he worked for was slandered in Zhihu. Zhihu's feedback turned out to be "We think well-known enterprises should be openly discussed by the public".

Zhihu's irresponsible virtue is bound to arouse the anger of netizens and must be highly valued by relevant parties. Zhihu is an Internet knowledge discussion community. It is obviously beyond the scope of "knowledge discussion" to personally attack public figures by naming names. Since Zhihu flaunts itself as "authentic", registered users should check it according to the requirements of real-name registration system. In fact, the threshold for registration in Zhihu is very low. Men can pretend to be women, and one person can play multiple roles, which is obviously far from the truth. Is Zhihu's comment true?

As an online Q&A community dedicated to sharing professional knowledge, experience and opinions, Zhihu should have kept a distance from news and current affairs. There are indications that Zhihu is becoming a force to be reckoned with on the field. Last year's two hot spots-"Wei Zexi" and "Leiyang Case" both originated from Zhihu, and Zhihu has always been an important position in the subsequent disputes.

One person is divided into roles to solve the problem that new media lacks a gatekeeper mechanism. If this problem is not solved well, Zhihu can't become bigger, let alone stronger. The so-called immortality. How far Zhihu can go depends entirely on whether Zhihu is right or not. If rumors are allowed to spread and some users are allowed, there will be no future.

Is the answer above reliable with Zhihu? Related content, is the answer on Zhihu reliable? Share. I read the comments in Zhihu, hoping to help everyone!