500D, I'll add an old baiwei. Is it effective? Mainly shooting women's shoes. The new Budweiser feels a little expensive.

There is no weakness in macro, and the optical quality of Laobaigan is guaranteed. But the problem is that you are shooting shoes, and the shoes themselves are not tiny things. If you want to use macro, the equivalent focal length on your fuselage is 160mm, and then if you want to shoot the whole shoe, you have to retreat. Don't talk about depth of field, even if your room is big, you can shoot well. So it is not appropriate to shoot such a big product with Budweiser. You don't really need a macro lens.

When shooting this kind of products, it is best to use a lens with a shorter focal length, such as the over-valued 50/ 1.8, Sigma's 50/ 1.4 (workmanship, reputation and quality are better than those of the original factory), zoom 17-50/2.8 (high definition) and zoom from the original factory.

As for the reflection, it is best to put the shoes on a smooth platform. In the absence of backlight, as long as the camera angle is appropriate, you can take a satisfactory reflection. Besides, the lights should be on. That's all I can say. If you want to be more detailed, it is estimated that it can be regarded as a business secret of professional photographers.

In addition, this "reflection" in the picture is obviously post-produced, and the perspective is completely wrong. If it's this level, shoot it.