How about taking a guest photo with a broken camera?

How about taking a guest photo with a broken camera?

To be sure, it is no problem to shoot guest photos with a half camera.

To tell the truth, there is no difference between the two kinds of equipment except the visual difference.

If you put two photos taken by two machines in front of you, can you tell them apart? I don't know anyway.

Making excellent guest films actually has a lot to do with lens, lighting, props and post-production. To tell the truth, it has something to do with half-length films or full-length films, but it is only a small difference.

As long as you have a good grasp of the characteristics of the equipment and the imaging characteristics of the lens, have an excellent lighting system and a strong later stage, the guest film you shot with half a film can also attract people's attention.

The above is my opinion, and friends are welcome to supplement and exchange.

The answer is divided into two aspects. First, can the performance of the equipment itself support taking photos that customers are satisfied with?

Look at the picture first

I took a picture with Fuji x 100v paraxial camera, which is a typical afterimage camera. But can you still feel the relaxed mood revealed by your sister from the photos? Therefore, whether the residual film can take good-looking photos depends almost not on the performance of the camera itself, but on how you use this machine. The concept of residual film camera is a new concept from film age to digital age. The concept is based on the film of film era 135. During the transition to the digital age, I started to use Canon's earliest consumer-grade digital SLR because of the technical problems of cmos and the need of marketization. The first digital SLR I bought was Canon's 300d.

A typical apsc frame machine, with which I have taken photos, wedding photos and even commercial albums, has put me on the track of photography. Moreover, since the camera iteration, the development of digital cameras has changed with each passing day. There is absolutely no problem that there is not enough guest film. More importantly, people's fascination with full-frame cameras does not need to change the focal length coefficient, and the background blur looks more severe, but these are not the key factors to determine whether they can take good-looking photos.

So finally, how about taking a guest photo with a broken camera? My answer is very easy to use.

Hello, I'm a calligraphy teacher who rides a motorcycle and plays photography. I want to talk about your problem. I'm happy to help you!

Divided into low-end customers, mid-end customers and high-end customers; Different prices, different needs, see the video:

The following two sets of equipment, Sony A9+ Sony 85mm 1.4 G Master and Sony a 6500+ Zeiss 55mm F 1.8, are used to shoot the same picture with basically the same equivalent focal length and the same composition. We will publish the complete picture and compare it with APS-C format. See if you can recognize which one was shot. Which is the residual lens?

This contrast does not mean that the imaging effect of the residual image can be comparable to that of the holographic image, but it means that for most ordinary users, the residual image is enough to meet the shooting needs, and it is impossible to distinguish whether it is a holographic image or a residual image even if it is taken alone.

The imaging details, high dynamic performance and perspective effect of the full wide bottom are once and for all, but the lens of the fuselage is more expensive; There is little difference between the performance of afterimages and holograms in daily use, except that there is basically no inconvenience in changing the angle of view and focus, but the camera lens is cheaper.

If you are ambitious about photography and can persevere, of course, it is right to do it in one step; But if you are not sure about yourself, it is better to step by step, and don't eat fat; Friends who look at the whole picture with residual pictures in their hands don't have to struggle. They will take the current equipment to the limit, and when the limit can't satisfy themselves, they will decisively upgrade the whole picture.

In fact, the debate about residual width and full width has a long history, but for most of us, are residual width and full width really that important? I totally agree that the whole picture has its own incomparable competitiveness, but for most beginners, for many people who just look at the photos on the screen, is it necessary to buy the whole picture in one step?

No comments here. After all, everyone has his own opinion. The most important thing is to stick to your own ideas and choose the camera that suits you best.

I hope this article can inspire you who are hesitating-

The ghosting camera has its advantages, for example, the lens can be lighter, and the scenery can be shot farther with the same focal length, which is also the advantage of the ghosting camera. This advantage can also be used in portrait shooting. 35 fixed focus is converted into full-frame 52.5 (except Canon), and 85 fixed focus is converted into 127.5 (also except Canon), which are all within the focus range of portrait shooting. Send some domestic portraits of 85mm/F2.0 and Pentax K3lI to share with you!

Never mind, people are interested in your technology and finished products. Post-beautification, prop function, communication mode. It is unmatched by full-frame cameras. It took 50 days to shoot for a long time, and it took a while to shoot with D300. If it's just a portrait, no problem. If you are shooting a product that requires depth of field, you should consider post-operation.

There is still a big difference between the residual image and the hologram, but most girls just want to be white and soft, so it doesn't matter what they shoot.

I must be very tall. I can receive such a noble question [yeah] [yeah] [yeah]

Makes me feel smug for a while.