Some people say that nudity is the most sacred once it becomes art, and morality is the most obscene once it becomes hypocrisy. How to understand it?

? ? Some people say that nudity is the most sacred once it becomes art, and morality is the most obscene once it becomes hypocrisy. How to understand it?

When nudity becomes art, it will become the most sacred, that is to say, nudity needs to reach a threshold condition of "art" to have a "sacred" nature, but nudity itself does not have a sacred nature.

What does morality need to do to achieve the same goal? As long as it does not deteriorate, that is to say, the positive effects such as "order and harmony" equivalent to "sacredness" are the internal effects of morality, and it can achieve these goals without raising itself to a certain threshold.

The key point of this sentence is "morality is the dirtiest once it becomes hypocritical", and the first half of the sentence can be understood as an exaggerated modal particle similar to "much" in English.

Nudity is private and dirty, but once it is packaged with art, it can be publicly evaluated and talked about in the sun. "Once" and "Most" have exaggerated elements, aiming to emphasize that once morality becomes the umbrella of the wicked, it will give people a feeling of extreme nausea and filth, just like a gorgeous robe covered with lice.

? ? The author's two sentences are critical and negative. He neither agrees with nude art, but more importantly, he opposes doing things that hurt others under the banner of morality.

? He may meet some obviously selfish, dirty, despicable and even angry people around him, but he shows a pitiful gesture of righteously saying that he is just and has a moral foundation. This practice is not only hateful, but also unreasonable.