Which is better, Nokia 920 or Samsung S Ⅲ?

Of course, Nokia 920 is better than Samsung in technology and appearance. Samsung is not innovative and likes to imitate others.

Let's look at Nokia from another angle. Aside from the glory of the past and the weakness of Microsoft WP, the software and hardware of Lumia 920 and 820 are viewed from the user experience alone. Is the new product released by Nokia a good product? Let's take a look at the "lack of innovation" that Nokia has repeatedly criticized.

Colored shells are a tradition of Nokia. "Technology is based on shell replacement" once became a joke for users and the media to tease Nokia. But as long as the product itself is excellent, it is no problem to choose a colorful appearance. Consumers have different preferences for colors and need different appearance choices. When Apple's iPod Nano introduced colorful dresses, the market reaction was "Wow". When Canon introduced a variety of colors for the "Hello, Color”IXUS digital camera, the consumer's response was to push this series to the sales champion.

When smartphones are black and white, Nokia's color smartphones are definitely a substitute. From Nokia's point of view, the sales volume of classic blue is also significantly higher than that of black, and red is welcomed by female users. If both Apple and Canon are popular in the market because they are obscene, why is Nokia ridiculed for providing color cases for new mobile phones?

In terms of industrial design, the great success of iPhone is largely attributed to excellent industrial design. When other smartphones have roughly the same appearance and a large number of smartphones are imitating Apple's iPhone, the most recognizable smartphone may be Nokia. There was an impressive picture at the press conference, where several smartphones from different manufacturers were juxtaposed, while the Nokia Lumia 920 phone was completely different from other products.

This is the uniqueness that Nokia has always emphasized. When talking about Apple and Samsung's patents on smart phone design in court, Marco, senior vice president of Nokia? Marco Argenti commented: "This makes people pay more attention to the originality of design and the uniqueness of products." At least Nokia doesn't have to worry about Apple's patent stick at all.

In terms of hardware, look at the newly released mobile products of Samsung, Nokia and Motorola. The hardware parameters of the flagship products are almost the same: Qualcomm dual-core chip is adopted, the main frequency is 1.5GHZ, the memory is 1GB, the storage space is 16GB or 32GB, and the screen resolution is 1280*768. It's hard to be original and there are few bright spots. In terms of hardware, smart phones have become a commodity market like PCs.

Where is the innovation? Major manufacturers are looking for a breakthrough: Motorola Mobile has a 3000mAh ultra-large capacity battery, Samsung Galaxy Note competes for the market segment with a 5.5-inch screen, and Nokia's innovation lies in the camera, PureView technology unveiled at the beginning of the year, and ultra-sensitive touch screen that can be operated with gloves.

I still remember that Nokia introduced the 808 with 4/kloc-0.0 million pixels, which was a surprise and made people firmly remember PureView technology. The combination of PureView and Lumia is the most anticipated function before the conference. Many media have speculated that the pixel of 920 will be at least14 million, but Lumia 920 does not use a high pixel sensor, but uses the mainstream 8.7 million pixels, which is why many people are disappointed.

So is the 920 innovative or degraded in shooting function? Let's take a look at what PureView technology is. Damian, Nokia's technical expert in this field? Damian Ding Ning's explanation is: "This is not the accumulation of pixels. Photography technology will be the overall performance of collaborative pixels, optical components and image processing in the future." It seems too one-sided to deny the innovation of 920 just because it is not equipped with ultra-high pixels like 808.

Look at the PureView II function of 920. Judging from the live pictures, this mobile phone already has the best camera function in smart phones. The key to the quality of digital camera is the ability of sensor, lens and image processing. Aside from carl zeiss-certified lenses, no other competitors use optical anti-shake lenses on smartphones except Nokia's new products, which is already the configuration of real cameras.

In addition to anti-shake, 920' s unique sensor technology makes the amount of light entering reach several times that of ordinary smartphone cameras. The picture of the same scene is very telling: in the central park at midnight, the photos taken by ordinary smartphones without flash are dark, and the foreground is clear and the background is dark after turning off the lights, while the photos taken by 920 are clear and bright, similar to the high-sensitivity noise reduction function in SLR cameras.

The most common use of mobile photography is sharing to social networks. Does the 920 really need to be equipped with 41million pixels? Under the premise of the current mobile phone network speed, storage space and network settings, it is really useless for mobile phones to take ultra-high pixel photos, because the current configuration of ordinary digital cameras is only100000 pixels. As far as picture quality is concerned, no other smartphone can reach the level of 920 at present.

Innovation also lies in user experience and understanding user needs. It's cold in winter in the north, and most people wear gloves when they go out. They always need to take out their mobile phones to check when they hear the phone message Weibo ringing. It's too cold to take off gloves, and you can't operate without taking off your mobile phone. Apple users even came up with the magic of replacing fingers with ham sausage. Many inconveniences, this is the field that needs innovation most.

920 saw this * * * defect of smart phone, and realized the precise operation of the phone with thick gloves through ultra-sensitive touch screen technology. This is the most practical innovation, and it is also a function that other smart phones do not have. In contrast, wireless charging technology needs to be perfected and matured, and the practical utility of innovation is not so obvious.

If 920 is not a Nokia product, but a Samsung or HTC product, will critics look at the color shell from another angle, evaluate PureView from another tone, and look at glove control from another angle? If these three selling points appear on Apple's iPhone, the industry may be amazed again, and Apple's sales may soar again.

So, why is Nokia in a period of change criticized by the media? Why is a product with at least a few innovations ridiculed? After the toothpaste innovation of Apple's recent products, are we too harsh on Nokia? Nokia's share price fell after hours, more from investors' judgment. But don't forget, after the release of iPhone 4S, Apple's share price once fell 14 USD.

At the press conference in new york, the editor-in-chief of technology blog Verge asked Shu Hua? Topolschi said after trying the 920: "This is the best smartphone I have ever used." Don't think that Topolschi is a Nokia fan, he is a die-hard Android fan. After the praise, he embarrassed Nokia: "If anyone can perfectly install Android 4. 1 on the 920, I would rather give him another $500."

Then his "the Verge" made Nokia even more humiliated: it revealed that the advertising segment of Nokia 920 was fake, and a professional camera was used to shoot anti-shake video instead of 920, although it was only a segment.

Perhaps this is an objective comment and the criticism is vicious, but it does not deny the Excellence and innovation of 920.