Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - What do you think of the military parade in 2009?

What do you think of the military parade in 2009?

I also read a lot of comments, not completely unreasonable, but exaggerated. There are two main criticisms:

First, the procession itself, 1999 and 1984 were not well queued. I basically agree with this, especially the team of Shijiazhuang Army Academy, which is not satisfactory. The team with guns is obviously neat, while several teams that are completely on foot suffer from the gesture of waving their hands, especially against the background of white gloves. It is very difficult to keep the position and rhythm of this wave absolutely consistent. Among them, naval cadets have an advantage because their uniforms are also white. These glitches are not obvious in dynamic video, but they are easily found in photo freeze-frames. This year's walking parade training time is not as long as before, and it is understandable that the uniformity has dropped slightly. Some foreign comments are sheer nonsense, such as accusing the female militia of having models, which are originally various militia. It is normal to have models. I think it is a bright spot to train beautiful models to be so spirited. The BBC also said that female militiamen are not suitable for fighting in bright red clothes. Aren't the uniforms of their British bear soldiers bright red and high hats suitable for fighting? This is because laymen don't know the difference between protocol clothes and training clothes. Generally speaking, I think the queue is a little lower than the previous two times, but it is still a world-class level and quite magnificent.

There is also the quality of CCTV broadcasts. There is a problem. This time, CCTV used advanced systems such as helicopters and flying cats, and gave a lot of moving shots and bird's-eye shots of big scenes, which were generally more spectacular than last time. However, there are too many backlights (probably to take more photos of the square background), which makes so many advanced equipment look gloomy, and it is obviously not enough for our army to "face the sun". In addition, the moment when the queue turns positive step by step is the most spectacular. However, the director always cuts off the camera. Moreover, the flying formation is neat only when it is shot below, but the director took a lot of shots in front with a telephoto lens, and the formation was completely invisible and messy. These unsatisfactory points reflect that CCTV directors on the one hand rely too much on high technology and neglect basic photography skills, on the other hand, they don't know enough about the military, especially the military parade. I sincerely hope that the version shot by Bayi Film Studio is much more exciting than this.

In a word, these are small problems that professionals care about. Generally speaking, whether it's queuing or CCTV broadcast, it's okay, not that bad. Those picky people are just showing off their knowledge. We should watch more exciting parts, such as all the equipment teams are not only quite advanced, but also the driving order is amazing. Such a large-scale military parade cannot be absolutely perfect. I'm already shocked and excited!