Which is more useful for developing hobbies, graphic designers or photographers?

The technical level is different, how to compare?

Let's just say it's all average,

If you are new to photography (inexperienced)

The technology is not that good.

Not convincing in front of guests.

No repeat customers of their own) should not be as high as the salary of graphic design (they are paid by piece)

Make more money as long as there are more orders);

If you are a photographer with senior technical experience, it is best to have your own customers.

The basic salary alone is much higher than that of graphic designers.

(And good photographers now do their own post-toning and effect parts.

Usually, the designer of the studio only basically checks a color set and a template.

)

Of course, it does not include very good designers.

There is no such graphic designer in a city.

If the same photographer

In this digital age

I must be strong in post-design.

And many graphic designers can take pictures themselves because of their later strength.

The lack of technology in the early stage can be completely made up in the later stage.

Almost the same thing

Both a photographer and a designer.