K5 D7000 or?

Nikon D7000, Canon 60D, Pentax K5 and Olympus E5 are the four most popular mid-to high-end cameras. In order to help you understand the characteristics of these cameras, I made a comparison of the above four machines from the aspect of machine hard indicators (the first part of the data comes from the second issue of Friends of Photography 2011; The second part compares the indicators in various official explanations in detail for individuals; The third part of the data comes from the Internet):

The first part:

Test lens, D7000 didn't see it, 60D used 18- 135, K5 used 18- 135, E5 didn't see it (judging from the lens focal lengths of opponents 60D and K5, it may be14.

Let's take a look at the specific score comparison:

Color depth: K5 (bit K5(23.7) > D7000 (bit 23.5) > 60d (bit 22.2) > E5 (bit 21.9).

Dynamic range: K5 (14.1ev) > d7000 (13.9evs) > 60d (11.5evs) > E5 (10.

ISO evaluation: d7000 (1167) > K5 (1162) > 60d (813) > E5 (519).

Central resolution: 60D(2700)>K5(2600) > D7000(2550)>E5( 1900).

Edge resolution: 60D(2560)>K5(2520) > D7000(2500)>E5( 1200).

The second part:

The following is my personal conclusion after carefully studying the comparison of these machines through various materials, which is just my personal opinion. Welcome to correct me:

Focusing accuracy: D7000 = E5 & gtK5 & gt；; 60D(D7000 has 39 focus points, including 9 cross sensors; Although E5 has only 1 1 focus points, they are all double cross sensors, so I think they are equivalent. K5 has 1 1 focal points, all of which are cross-shaped sensors; 60D has only 9 focus points, all of which are cross-shaped sensors).

Focusing speed: D7000 = E5 & gtK5=60D (focusing speed is related to the lens, E5 with swd lens should be the fastest, but without the help of swd, I'm afraid Nikon's focusing speed is faster, and this conclusion has not been properly verified. I hope to discuss with you).

Built-in settings: K5>；; D7000 & gtE5 & gt60D (There is no doubt that Pentax can provide you with its greatest strength, and Pentax will provide you with whatever you can think of and what you can't think of).

LCD screen: 60D & gtE5 & gtK5=D7000 (the rotating screen has the upper hand, and the pixel of 60D/kloc-0.04 million is better than E5' s pixel of 920,000).

Finder: E5 (field of view 100%, magnification 1. 15 times) > D7000 (field of view 100%, magnification 0.94 times) > K5 (field of view 100%)

Real-time viewing: D7000 = E5 & gtK5=60D (Nikon's latest 20 16 pixel sensor not only improves the accuracy of photometry, but also improves the accuracy of scene recognition).

Slot design: D7000 & gtE5 & gtK5=60D(E5 and D7000 are both dual-slot designs, and K5 and 60D are both single-slot designs, so D7000 has a higher rating than E5, because it is a dual-slot design and its volume is much smaller than E5).

Dust removal capacity: E5 & gtD7000 & gtK5=60D(E5 is a well-deserved dust removal champion; Nikon has a large bayonet and a high probability of being infected by dust; The dust removal levels of k5 and 60D are similar, and the dust removal principle of K5 is relatively backward. However, Canon has not solved the electrostatic problem on the sensor surface, and it is easier to absorb dust, so I think the dust removal levels of K5 and 60d are basically the same. )

Video capability: 60D (Full HD, 30/25/24fps)>K5 (Full HD, 25fps)>D7000 (Full HD, 24fps)>E5 (HD, 30fps).

Innovative ability: E5 & gtD7000=K5=60D(E5 proves to the world that pixel enhancement is not the only way to improve detail expression and resolution by reducing the intensity of low-pass filter and cooperating with TruePic V+ image processing engine. Considering that the ultrasonic dust removal technology, the flip screen technology and even the 4/3 technology are all initiated by Olympus, E5 is endowed with innovative advantages).

Weight: K5 (660g/740g) > 60d (675/755g) > D7000 (690/780g) > E5 (800g/870g).

Price: E5 (11500) > K5 (9000) > d7000 (8300) > 60d (6400) (the price of K5 is lowered quickly, and it can be further lowered if no invoice is needed).

The third part:

Continuous shooting speed (unit second): K5 (6.97) D7000 (5.96) > 60d (5.3) > E5 (with the same high-speed memory card).

The maximum number of shots per shot: 60d (31) > d7000 (22) > K5 (20) > E5 (the number of E5 is unknown, so it is estimated that it will not exceed 20).

Remarks: The test environment for continuous shooting speed and the maximum number of shots at a time is: fine JPG format with maximum resolution, and all functions such as correction, chip processing and noise reduction are turned off. Continuous shooting was performed 10 times respectively, and the average value was taken. According to the difference between the first shooting time and the last shooting time in EXIF data, the final actual continuous shooting speed is calculated. The data comes from here:/digi/10/1214/07/... i001624j3.html.

Judging from the above indicators, D7000 won 5 firsts, 7 second and 4 third; K5 won five firsts, four second and seven third. Among them, in the comparison of core indicators, D7000 is superior in focusing, and there are no obvious shortcomings in various indicators, which is worth buying; K5 is slightly superior in color and dynamic range, far superior to competitors in setting, and greatly improved in focus and high sense. Generally speaking, both D7000 and K5 are half a catty. If 60D is replaced by 7D, it is estimated that the difference will not be too big, and they are all good machines worth buying! ! E5 is different. There is a new way, and the resolution and image quality of160,000 pixels are achieved with120,000 pixels. This innovative spirit is admirable.