Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - IPhone 13ProMax and Nikon D780 real shot comparison: the difference is bigger than expected.

IPhone 13ProMax and Nikon D780 real shot comparison: the difference is bigger than expected.

Can iPhone 13ProMax replace SLR cameras and become the main equipment for daily photography? This paper introduces the comparison of photo effects between iPhone 13ProMax and Nikon D780. By comparing several photos, we can see whether iPhone 13ProMax can become a daily camera equipment.

The photos taken by Nikon D780 and iPhone 13ProMax in the same environment are quite different. Pay attention to the difference between them. In the photos taken by Nikon D780, the wood on the front of the wooden house is white, and the wood taken by iPhone 13ProMax is gray. The highlight effect of Nikon D780 will be more obvious.

In addition, due to the difference of lens depth of field, the scene before and after the wooden house photographed by Nikon D780 is blurred, while the green leaves and mangroves photographed by iPhone 13ProMax are relatively clear. In addition, in terms of color, the photos taken by iPhone 13ProMax are more vivid than those taken by Nikon D780.

Because the lens of Nikon D780 can be switched, the shooting focal length can be freely selected. For example, in the photo, the scenery behind the red flower is all blurred, and all other areas in the photo are blurred except for two flowers. The effect in the photos taken by iPhone 13ProMax is completely different from that of Nikon D780. There is not much blur between the flowers and the background, and the overall details can be seen.

In addition, in terms of color performance, the flowers photographed by Nikon D780 and iPhone 13ProMax have different shades. The flowers photographed by iPhone 13ProMax are very bright, while the flowers photographed by Nikon D780 are lighter.

Macro shooting effect, Nikon D780 and iPhone 13ProMax shoot leaves with obvious differences. In the macro shooting of iPhone 13ProMax, the veins and meridians on the surface of leaves are clear, and many details are also clear.

The surface lines of leaves photographed by Nikon D780 are not clear enough, and the color and brightness are not as good as those of iPhone 13ProMax. The leaves photographed by IPhone 13ProMax are brighter, and the desktop has bright light reflected by light. The leaves photographed by Nikon D780 are light in color and the surface lines are not clear enough.

There are obvious differences between Nikon D780 and iPhone 13ProMax in this set of photos. For example, the camera body shot by iPhone 13ProMax is bright, and the dermatoglyphics are clearly visible, and the details of the camera body edge can be seen. The overall effect is quite good.

The whole photo taken by Nikon D780 is not bright enough, the dermatoglyphics on the surface of the fuselage are not clear enough, the boundary of the fuselage is not clear enough, and the boundary and background are ambiguous. Personally, I think this group of photos is not as effective as iPhone 13ProMax.

The effect difference of the fifth group of photos is mainly in the effect of photos. For example, Nikon D780 blur effect is good, but the brightness of the photo is low, the green of the leaves is not bright enough, and the boundary of the leaves is not clear enough.

The leaves taken by iPhone 13ProMax have clear boundaries and colorful photos. However, unlike Nikon D780, due to the fixed camera lens, the background blur effect is not as good as Nikon D780, which is also the shortcoming of iPhone 13ProMax.

The effect comparison between Nikon D780 and iPhone 13ProMax has been shown to you through these five groups of photos. If the photo effect of iPhone 13ProMax is unprofessional, it can meet the daily photo needs. IPhone 13ProMax can take pictures instead of Nikon D780 in daily use, but if there are higher requirements, it is estimated that SLR cameras will still be used to take pictures.