Is it good or bad for beginners to pursue "big blur"? Why?

When I first came into contact with photography, I was confused about the blur effect of SLR and thought it was great. This blur is called photography.

Moreover, some people will admire your vague works with envy. This photo is really good, and the subject is prominent. You must also ask how the background is blurred. What was praised at that time really blossomed in my heart. I'm so vain, I'm embarrassed to say that the camera blurred the background by itself.

Times have changed. In retrospect, it has been almost ten years. At that time, SLR cameras were still new in our small city, and the photos taken were more masterpieces of card machines. But I really got on the boat of photography because of the great emptiness.

I don't know if it's just me, but I began to like photography because of the big blur. At that time, I was also obsessed with the creation of blurred works for a long time. The earliest fixed focus lens was a 50-caliber spittoon. Remember, at that time, no matter what you shoot, it must be 1.8 aperture, for fear of blurring, and you never consider whether you want a background or not. In fact, it is very funny and ridiculous to look at yourself at that time. I wonder if other photographers have similar experiences.

Later, I slowly went deep into the study of photography, only to find out where photography is so monotonous. Photography is simply the sea of Wang Yang. So, now let's see if beginners in photography pursue the topic of "blurring". I think it is understandable as long as they are not paranoid and don't stare at a point like a dead end. Because with the deepening of photography learning, we will naturally understand that we should set the virtual reality according to the needs of the picture and realize the accurate exposure of the picture through the cooperation of aperture, shutter and sensitivity; Under what circumstances, it is most appropriate to strip off the clutter of foreground and background and highlight the subject in a vague way.

For me, the "big sky" is the master, who leads the door and practices in the individual. So, I still want to thank "Hero Shadow".

The size of the aperture should be reasonably selected according to the shooting scene, but * * * has the same characteristics, and the subject should have enough clarity, so it is not possible to cook jiaozi with porridge.

Is it good or bad for every beginner to pursue "big blur"?

When we photographers are just getting started, we are often attracted by the beautiful blur effect at first sight, which is also a form of the so-called strangeness of photography. It is this strangeness that makes people feel amazing and curious, so that you may immediately have the impulse to put down your mobile phone and pick up the camera to blur the background. The photographer's blur effect generally means that the blurred portrait of the scenery other than the protagonist looks much better. Generally speaking, novices should also learn to blur the background, and such photos are just different. Whether you are a beginner or an amateur, we should learn to take better pictures. Portrait photography has a very good blurred background. Why not? If you just want to take pictures, then you should learn everything. Thank you for reading!

Personally, I don't think this is good or bad. The fuzzy shooting method has nothing to do with Xiao Bai. Mainly depends on what he just started with the camera. Generally speaking, most beginners may buy a set of lenses, such as 24- 105. If you take a portrait with such a lens, the blur effect is definitely not good. One is the short focal length, and the other is the small aperture, which is not easy to blur, so the beginner's "big blur" is good. Send some blurred photos I took to see:

For beginners, it is a bad phenomenon to blindly pursue the effect of "big blurring" I think we should choose the degree of ambiguity according to the actual situation. Only when it's blurred can you take a clear picture. The combination of reality and reality to show the rhythmic beauty of the picture is what beginners pursue.

Because novices are fascinated by the blurring effect of the background, including myself, I just started to look at the photos taken by those photographers. The background is blurred beautifully and there are all kinds of spots. So, at the beginning, I also bought a small spittoon lens, thinking that a large aperture can shoot a beautiful blur effect. But it didn't turn out. I just bought a small spittoon, and I photographed it for a while. Unfortunately, because the aperture is too large, even the subject of shooting is empty, which is the result of pursuing great blurring.

Therefore, if you are a beginner in photography, you'd better first pursue clear shooting and practice basic skills, such as reasonable exposure, safe combination of aperture, sensitivity and shutter, and use of light and shadow. Of course, we don't just shoot with blur, we just need to pursue blur appropriately. Empty is empty, it is real.

Is it good or bad for beginners to pursue "big blur"? Why?

I believe that many friends who entered the photography door had a fever at the early stage of "fever" because they enjoyed the exquisite blurred background works.

Of course, me too. At that time, I saw some portraits and flower works, and the charming Jiao Wai made people linger, and I was always confused about the effect.

Finally, after reading all kinds of materials and friends' introductions, I realized that the effect was caused by the change of lens aperture, so I made a painstaking study of cameras and lenses and finally made up my mind to buy a SLR.

My first shot was 50/ 1.8, which was very cheap. However, this lens is not simple and has a large aperture. For beginners, its effect is quite cost-effective. It's beautiful to shoot portraits or flowers in Jiao Wai.

Let's talk about vagueness first.

Fuzzy, in fact, the most important thing is to look at the subject matter of shooting. If the background is messy, then we usually have to shoot with a slightly larger aperture, so as to highlight the subject.

If you make a documentary, you'd better not use a big aperture. If the aperture is too large, it will become a portrait.

If you want to shoot flowers, you can shoot them with a slightly larger aperture, so as to highlight the main body.

Suggestion: No matter what kind of lens, generally speaking, it is best not to shoot with the maximum aperture of the lens, because the imaging under the maximum aperture is not very good and the imaging quality is not very good. The best imaging should be to reduce the maximum aperture by about two apertures, which is the best choice.

These are my views on this issue, and friends are welcome to add them.

"Big blur", that is, small depth of field, highlights the subject through the contrast between reality and reality, but it does not need "big blur" in terms of shooting content.

Great blur is suitable for shooting portraits, flowers and the like, but beginners don't just shoot such subjects, do they? If it's just portraits and flowers, it's not all suitable for "big blur".

The Great Illusion not only highlights the subject through the contrast between reality and reality, but sometimes it is also because the background is chaotic, so the background can be blurred through the Great Illusion.

If the background is beautiful, is all "blurring" a waste? !

Sometimes "big blur" is beyond our reach, like shooting birds, which requires a fast shutter speed. Is it necessary to turn up the aperture? Turn on the big aperture and the "big blur" will come.

However, The Big Blur is not suitable for all subjects. For example, when the scenery is beautiful, you need a small aperture and a large depth of field to achieve the purpose of clarity.

Whether it is a novice or an experienced person, "blurring" is just one of the expressions. In actual shooting, the depth of field must be determined as needed. The diversity of forms will enrich the diversity of works.

Try to express it as much as possible.

Nothing is good, it depends on whether the theme needs to be decided.

Ambiguity can highlight the theme.

Is it good or bad for beginners to pursue "big blur"? Why?

Answer: For beginners of photography, using blur can really make photos look brighter and brighter. This is the closest way to the master. It's not bad to take only such photos all my life, and I can also produce good works. If you love a lot and are curious, you can study and practice deeply and broaden the scope of technology.