Is the image quality of Canon camera not as good as that of Sony camera?

Let me try to explain:

1. The quality of imaging mainly depends on three aspects: photosensitive chip, image processing chip, and lens.

2. Each brand has different product lines, which are divided into high, middle and low-end products.

3. Sometimes even old horses stumble, and if a brand does well, it will continue to grow. It doesn’t mean that it has never made failed products.

Therefore, it does not make much sense to directly compare the imaging results of two brands of cameras.

Furthermore, although their imaging may be different, for you or your application, if there is not much difference, there is no meaning in comparison.

Since price is a comprehensive reflection of appearance, performance, service and other aspects, even for products at the same price, some may be better in terms of body materials, some in lenses, and in terms of investment. The cost is different, and the image quality and effect will be different. It can be said that the picture quality of ultra-thin DCs is not very good, or it is not easy to make, and they are more expensive than ordinary DCs, but there are still many people buying them, so comparison is still meaningless.

Maybe you think it is incredible, but it is the fact. Roast duck and KFC have different tastes. Everyone has their own preferences. Which one do you think is more delicious? These two brands are of similar quality and have their own characteristics. It is not easy to compare. The most practical thing is to operate the DC you are interested in in person and take a look at its imaging on the computer. Just meet the requirements. I usually see the master's Most of the works have been post-processed. . . .