Which of these two lenses is worth buying? I mainly take photos, taking scenery as the theme?

1, these two lenses are both half-frame image fields, and Sony's half-frame E-mount has no inversion (micro-single);

2, Sony large zoom E 18-200 second generation is not recommended to buy. E 18-200 is a Sony lens made by Longteng, and it is the lens with the worst optical quality among all Tianya mirrors, none of which;

3. If you need to add Tianya Mirror (Tianya Mirror is easy to use when traveling with large zoom, which is a compromise), it is recommended to choose Sony's silver E 18-200 generation (commonly known as thermos cup). The optical quality is much better than the black E 18-200 second generation, but the disadvantage is that it is hard to buy new products because of a big circle. If it is not a travel demand, it is not recommended to choose Tianya mirror;

4. Sony ultra-wide E 10- 18 is optional. Sony has few choices of semi-non-anti-ultra wide-angle lens, among which the better wide-angle lens is Old Frog 9mm/f2.8, but the disadvantage is that it is manual and can't be played by novices. The other is 16mmf/ 1.4 (one of the three musketeers), which is of good quality, but the equivalent viewing angle is only 24mm, which is not wide enough. Zoom wide angle is only applicable to E 10- 18 and T 1 1-20.

5. Longteng11-20mf/2.8diii-arxd is recommended for the zoom wide-angle lens. Bisogne10-18 has better optical quality, with a magnification of 1: 4, a larger aperture and a shorter focusing distance.

6. If the zoom lens is for daily use, Longteng17-70 mm f/2.8 diiii-a VC RXD is recommended, and E 18-200 lens is not recommended; If telephoto is needed, Sony 70-350mm lens is recommended.