Everyone said, is Sony's SLR good?

Sony's SLR, although the brand is very hard, I personally don't like it. Zeiss and Minolta joined hands with Sony, which I have to admire. Sony is definitely the industry leader in small cameras and camcorders.

SLR is not so easy to get started. In terms of SLR, it is indeed worse than Canon and Nikon.

Nikon, the machine is stable, the imaging quality is high, the image definition is high, and the scenery is the first choice. This is recognized and the focus is accurate. It's time for Nikon to cross focus at the aperture of 4, and Canon's cross focus can only work at the aperture of 2.8. Canon has fast focusing speed, high machine parameters and soft colors, especially for portraits.

Look at Sony again, can you compare it?

Focusing speed, no ultrasonic motor technology, no body motor, for some manual high-end lenses, just look at copying. ...

I tried @900 plus Zeiss 135/ 1.4, and the color reproduction ability is really strong, but I think it is too strong, especially when I make Chinese knots, which is too sharp. In fact, I have to admit that the lens of Zeiss is really good, but I think it is too wasteful to use it on Sony's fuselage. ...