Why do the lenses in some movies move around? Is it intentional?

Why do some movie lenses swing around? Is this intentional? Well, how should I put this? Most movies have to maintain a certain sense of picture, that is, the stability of the picture, right? And if it looks like this, it will also be modified in the post-production process, and it will be very textured, right? In this film era, how stable the camera is when a person is running is a very important basic skill for photographers. Just like when we say calligraphers write a word now, the quality of the handwriting is the core of it. , and the photographer at that time meant that the lens could remain stable, right? Keep the protagonist in the middle of the needle of the lens and pass by the lighting engineer. According to the lighting engineer's special position, the lights and the protagonist were included on the film at a deliberate time. This This is a very important work of his, and there are many of them now. If you want to understand some film craftsmanship at that time, they also built a special track. It is to keep the picture flat, and what follows is that the entire shot serves the movie and serves the director's intention of performance. What's more important about this shot is that it makes people immersed in the scene. Uh, there's some jingtian dangling around. The film should be from this blog legend, which means he didn't act in this movie. This is that one. The Bourne Supremacy, right? It's not Mission: Impossible, it's The Bourne Supremacy. Uh, the whole scene he played was shaking, just for this, to make this, um, the audience, right, have this kind of experience? Nervous, right? His trembling fingers are really good, but this has become a classic, and the sense of picture has become a classic. I think it seems to have been won by the Oscar for Best Cinematography, uh, it seems. It can be said that he is a very good benchmark in movies where the picture and the camera are shaking.

So you can go to many movies and play it back and forth. This is deliberate. Of course, if this kind of swinging around makes you feel bad about this kind of movie, it means that they The technology of the film and the director's technology are very poor, because the purpose of making a film is to serve the audience, to let the audience focus on the film. How to say this in the past, that is, if it lasts 90 minutes, right? No eating, no drinking, no talking, no toilets is truly a good movie, so all you see is there to serve you, and you have to like it. If you don't like it, then it can only be said that the filming is really rubbish.

丶