Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Nikon D8 10 upgraded to D850, mainly shooting portraits. Is it worth it?

Of course it's worth it, no doubt! Nikon d8 10 is an old product. D850 broke the convention and rose from 8 10 to 850 at

Nikon D8 10 upgraded to D850, mainly shooting portraits. Is it worth it?

Of course it's worth it, no doubt! Nikon d8 10 is an old product. D850 broke the convention and rose from 8 10 to 850 at

Nikon D8 10 upgraded to D850, mainly shooting portraits. Is it worth it?

Of course it's worth it, no doubt! Nikon d8 10 is an old product. D850 broke the convention and rose from 8 10 to 850 at once, spanning several numbers in the middle. This is a different operation. Nikon d850 not only improves many pixels, but also has a much higher latitude. It can be said that d850 is the best camera besides Nikon D series and Canon X series. If you have d8 10, upgrade to d850 if possible, and the effect of portrait shooting will be much better than d8 10. Everything is worth a penny. Besides, you may have used d8 10 for a long time, and it's time to change it.

Everything is moving forward. D8 10 may be the dominant player in previous years, but d850 is more perfect, easier to use and more beautiful, naturally throwing d8 10 out of a few blocks. People like d8 10 are not as good as d850 in pixel, latitude and color. It turns out that I also have d8 10, and I decided to replace it after d850 came out. I have to make an appointment to get the d850 on 20 18. The original d800 was finally eliminated by d8 10, and it is the same now. D8 10 portrait is no matter how good it is, it is still not as good as d850. It is suggested to exit from d8 10 and quickly enter d850. You won't regret it.

If you don't need to upgrade 850 for portrait shooting, the reasons are as follows: there is not much room for upgrading the first control, and 850 has an additional directional lever, which is more convenient for free focusing. If you are used to using the steering wheel, there is no need to change your habits; The second pixel is improved, but it doesn't make any sense. I am a professional photographer. I have always set 8 10 as a small size raw for daily commercial shooting, which is equivalent to about15 million pixels, and it is enough to enlarge it to 36 inches. If I always think that large pixels can cut the picture, then I suggest practicing basic skills first, not relying on secondary composition. Thirdly, I suggest buying the original battery box. There will be many opportunities to take portraits vertically, which is very convenient.

All the above were taken on 8 10. I don't think you can tell the difference if it's 850! 8 10 uses f 1.4 aperture for indoor shooting, with high sensitivity of 3200 and no pressure. If it is a local tyrant, I suggest replacing 850, which can be more professional!

I am a retired worker, and I like taking pictures. I also like to go to photographic equipment exhibitions, photographic equipment stores and look at those camera lenses online. I had an eye addiction once. Now I mainly take some scenery photos, and I have taken portraits and street photos before. The cameras used are Nikon D800 bought in June 20 12 and Sony 6000 bought in June 20 15. When taking pictures, they are all in RAW image file format, without any delay or video, just taking some single photos and 360 VR panorama. After Nikon D850 went on the market, I was particularly eager for the flip screen and the direct-view imaging of 1: 1. Several times when I was ready to buy it, I opened my camera bag and saw my D800. I think it's good. From 20 12 to 10 up to now, the shutter has been pressed for 30,000 times, including one's fingers itch, and there is no reason to eliminate it after tossing and turning. But I really like the way Nikon D850 takes pictures. A few days ago, I packed a stack of money in my small schoolbag and went to Wukesong. I touched the D850 on the booth again, and I smashed the stack of hundred-dollar bills in my schoolbag. I stood for a while and went home without buying. I think it's too much to replace the original D800 just for that way of framing. If you want to take some low-angle photos in the future, you can use that Sony 6000. If you want to take some photos of 1: 1, Nikon D800 also has a square framing auxiliary line. Remember to cut it on the computer when you take a view (the disadvantage is that you will forget the original idea of this image after a long time).

Is it worthwhile for Nikon 8 10 to upgrade the master portrait 850? I don't think it's worth it

Nikon upgraded from D800 to D8 10 and then to D.

850。 In fact, it is an online product, and some settings are slightly improved to cater to customers, so as to maximize product benefits.

For portrait shooting, D8 10 is enough, plus the portrait lens, your photography appreciation level is poor.

Of course, it is not impossible to upgrade from Nikon D8 10 to D850. I think it must be local tyrants or equipment parties. Feel a little, welcome to pay attention to the comments.

If there is no shortage of money, I suggest upgrading to Nikon camera D850. This camera not only has high pixels, but also has high sensitivity and high image quality. The continuous shooting speed is much higher than D8 10. I bought Nikon D850 a few months ago, and now it is my main machine. I often shoot flowers and birds.

Nikon D8 10 upgraded to D850, mainly shooting portraits. Is it worth it? We should analyze this problem one-sidedly, and it is ok to change it or not.

These two cameras are both good cameras, and it is also good to take pictures with this camera.

Judging from these two cameras, Nikon D850 is better. It can be said that it is the high-end flagship machine of Nikon SLR, with high pixel and high image quality. The most gratifying thing is that its endurance is quite good, and it has strong coke chasing ability and reaction speed.

In the past, we often said that the portrait taken by Nikon camera was not ideal, mainly because of color performance, but this phenomenon was completely improved on the 850. The portrait taken by Nikon 850 is quite beautiful in color, without the "stiff" feeling of previous colors, but with an "elegant" feeling.

In addition, this machine has super-high pixels, which can provide us with more space and cutting scale in the later stage.

Speaking of 850, let's talk about 8 10. In fact, the biggest feature of this camera was the ultra-low sensitivity at that time, which should be revolutionary at that time. Because of its ultra-low sensitivity, its advantages in shooting scenery are more obvious.

In fact, these two cameras can be replaced or not.

If you have more money, then you can change it. After all, 850 is better.

If it is an ordinary user, it is recommended not to change it. You'd better leave money to change the lens.

The above is my opinion, and friends are welcome to add or comment.

Sword dance images, western photographers, welcome to pay attention.

My 20 12 has risen from D90 to 800, and I don't think the picture of using the 850 machine around me is better than that of 800. I won't consider upgrading until one day I die on my 800th birthday. There are very few portraits specially taken. I don't think it's necessary to take a portrait with 850. Because portrait photography eventually needs a lot of modifications in the later period before it can be released. If you want to shoot sports themes, then use more advanced ones.

This upgrade is of little significance. Compared with 8 10, the shooting performance of 850 has indeed been significantly improved, which can adapt to more application fields and more limited shooting environment, and the video has also been significantly improved. But for portrait shooting, the image quality is not much better than 8 10. You can try D5 or D4s digital camera. Although the pixels are not high, the unique charm of flagship machine God imaging is not comparable to 8xx series.