Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Is photography expensive?

Is photography expensive?

The spittoon is Canon's 50 1.8 Nikon's dog is set at 50 1.8, which is not bad!

Canon has no body drive, so the lens has a motor, and the ultrasonic motor focuses quickly. What's the name USM? Other manufacturers have SSM, and everything is the same thing.

Nikon was initially driven by the fuselage, and AF-S series was driven by the lens.

I think so, too. Nikon's machine body is relatively strong, and it is not bad when driving the lens, but the sound is a little louder, but the focusing speed of the same grade machine and lens is not much different.

Canon's red circle is too expensive, neither a red circle nor a dog (this may be a bit excessive). Every manufacturer has a cow head that users miss so much. See how you choose. Personally, I like Pentax K7. Digitalization is no better than movies. The same head portrait is the same, and the films made by different bodies are similar. In the digital age, the body participates in imaging, in which CMOS has an important influence.

I suggest you visit Wuji more often.

Instant noodles are not terrible, what is terrible is repeated investment. . Money should be spent on the cutting edge.