Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Taking a wedding photo and falling into the water killed two people. 1 lost contact and the bride was taken away. Does the photography company have to pay for it?

Taking a wedding photo and falling into the water killed two people. 1 lost contact and the bride was taken away. Does the photography company have to pay for it?

Whether to compensate for this depends on whose idea it is to take wedding photos on a typhoon day. If it is the decision of the wedding photography company, the bride can't be killed, but if it is the decision of the bride and groom, the groom will compensate the photography company instead, because a 17-year-old makeup artist was also killed, and the photographer is now in a state of losing contact.

1. Taking a wedding photo and falling into the water killed two people. 1 lost. In recent years, accidents have occurred in various scenic spots and amusement facilities among network celebrities. It's the turn of online celebrities to take wedding photos this time. A couple is taking the best wedding photos of their lives at the seaside in Dongtou District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province. Unexpectedly, disaster suddenly arrival. Under the influence of typhoon weather, huge waves swept away the bride, makeup artist and photographer, leaving the groom alone in the wind.

After the incident, netizens had a heated debate about who should pay compensation, and this extreme weather area among online celebrities once again entered the blacklist of some newcomers taking wedding photos. Obviously, without this incident, new people would still do the dangerous but possible thing of taking beautiful wedding photos wave after wave.

In the end, the photography company and the couple will pay for the dead, and the living will naturally go to court. However, in this case, because the two parties belong to the employment relationship, that is, the newlyweds pay for the wedding photography company to shoot, the compensation of both parties should actually be decided by the terms in the contract. In other words, it is difficult to judge who should lose money to whom without seeing the agreement signed by both parties.

Of course, in my opinion, it is very possible for young couples to ask the wedding photography team to shoot in typhoon days in pursuit of beautiful wedding photos. However, it is not excluded that the photography team uses this extreme weather stunt to attract couples to shoot. In the end, the two sides held their own words, and no one admitted that they had shot first. How to judge in the end depends on how much evidence the police can grasp.