Why do some people take better photos with entry-level SLR than Quan Huafu SLR?

Therefore, I personally don't recommend using half-width and full-width as a sign of whether the machine is high-e

Why do some people take better photos with entry-level SLR than Quan Huafu SLR?

Therefore, I personally don't recommend using half-width and full-width as a sign of whether the machine is high-end or not. For the convenience of explanation, we will discuss this issue on the premise of the same picture, for your reference only:

1. What is the main difference between an entry-level machine and a high-end machine?

1, more functions

For example, more detailed functions, such as metering, focusing mode and so on. ;

2, the shooting efficiency is higher

Such as all kinds of physical keys all over the body:

3, the durability of the fuselage is more secure.

High-end machines have better workmanship, and their protection and durability need to meet the needs of professional photography, which is one of the main differences from entry-level machines:

Second, whether the machine is high-end or not is not directly related to the quality of the film. From the general aesthetic point of view, the technical standard of a good-looking movie can be summarized as 25 words: clear focus, accurate exposure, reasonable composition, harmonious color and appropriate lighting:

To put it bluntly, whether a photo is "good-looking" depends largely on the photographer's "shooting level"; It has nothing to do with "what machine was it taken with":

Third, why do you sometimes feel that the entry machine is better? Sometimes we may feel that even in the same scene and under the same parameters, it seems that the film taken by the portal machine is more "bright", "transparent" and better looking; In view of this phenomenon, Xiao K thinks that the main reason is that the entry machine has richer and more intelligent functions of in-machine retouching and optimization, or that the intensity of in-machine retouching is more "strong":

Therefore, it is understandable that the direct production of the entry machine is more "beautiful".

Love photography and life, and strive to create the most valuable photography from the media. Welcome to pay attention to "Little K Impression", learn more photography skills and common sense, and make progress in learning.

Above: Fuji XE2 shot, the fuselage of more than 4000 yuan.

Above: Olympus EM5MK 1 shot, also more than 4,000 fuselage.

The above picture is even worse. It was taken by Canon EOS 100D, and the refurbished machine cost more than 2000 yuan.

But don't just look at these bodies. They are very cheap.

The first one is equipped with Leica 50mmF 1.4 lens.

The second one is equipped with an Olympus 75mm F 1.8 lens.

The third picture is a Canon 70-200mm F4L lens.

In addition to the need to pay attention to equipment, plus some shooting experience and years of research.

The above is not a gimmick. I think the photos above are average, but they are better than my friends around me.

I mean, it doesn't matter whether the fuselage is expensive or not. What matters is the lens, and what matters is the understanding of the picture. The lens is easy to handle, but it takes some time to understand the picture.

Many functions and performances of the camera are actually redundant, that is to say, in fact, many times, we simply don't use such a good camera. In other words, low-grade cameras and even camera phones can meet most of the shooting needs, which is more than enough.

Nikon D3200, the representative of low-grade SLR.

Nikon D850, the representative of high-end camera.

So, what shooting needs must rely on high-end cameras?

Your specific question is that some people can only take junk photos with Nikon D850, and some people can also take good photos with Nikon D3200, a low-end camera. Why?

Let me give you a specific answer to your specific question:

1, Nikon D850 and Nikon D3200, there is no doubt that Nikon D850 is much higher-end. For some photographic subjects that need high-quality or high-speed snapshot, Nikon D850 can definitely crush Nikon D3200.

2. However, if you are a novice, Xiao Bai knows nothing, the camera operation is not skilled, and the aesthetic level of photography art is very poor, then even the best camera is useless.

3, especially for high-end cameras, you need to know the operation of the camera and the practical application of technical terms, so as to give full play to the maximum potential of high-end cameras.

In fact, if you are a real photographer, you can fully exert the greatest potential of the low-grade camera Nikon D3200, which is even more powerful than the Nikon D850 used by ordinary photographers.

What are the advantages of Nikon D850 over Nikon D3200?

A, better snapshot performance, stronger autofocus performance, faster and more accurate, faster continuous shooting speed.

B, greater tolerance, richer and more delicate colors, better brightness recording range and color recording range.

B, the background blur is stronger.

In other words, if you are a professional photographer, you'd better use Nikon D850.

A, sports sports photography, bird photography, news capture, capture ability of Nikon D850, absolutely crush Nikon D3200.

B, the ultimate scenery photography, the pursuit of the best picture quality, this Nikon D850 is also crushing Nikon D3200.

C, professional portrait photography, this is not much to say. If you want to support your family by this, you have to be sincere.

There was once a good friend who loved photography for many years. Film starts, digital continues, and SLR matches. It cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. He drives swans to shoot golden monkeys in Qinling every year. . .

In-depth study, from my three-legged cat's point of view, his films and albums can be included in National Geographic. Later, in their system, the photo contest really won the prize.

One day a few years ago, he stopped playing SLR, and the photos taken by his mobile phone friends circle were still beautiful and amazing!

In this case, the big problem is that you only "lower your head to pull the car" and don't "look up at the road". This is not the right way to learn photography!

First, any camera can take good photos, and even today's mobile phones can take better photos than Quan Huafu SLR.

Second, to take a good photo, you need not only a camera (mobile phone), but also a photographer's conception, light consumption, composition, color and so on.

Therefore, we have seen some photographers shoot excellent works with low-end cameras, and some photographers shoot bad films with hundreds of thousands of cameras around their necks. Therefore, the camera is just a tool, and the key to making a good film is you. It depends on your knowledge, experience and skills.

The camera is just a tool. Whether you use it well or not depends on yourself. Then the photographer must know when the building you are shooting was built or who built it before shooting, so as to know the feedback that any emoticon photo brings to the audience. See how the person needs to express himself before shooting someone. . So the camera is a tool. It all depends on the photographer's knowledge, cultivation and nature.

Why do some people take better photos with entry-level SLR than Quan Huafu SLR?

A: Whether a photo is taken well has little to do with the grade of the equipment, but high-grade cameras are easier to ensure the image quality, and low-grade cameras need better technology. The decisive factor of a good photo is not the equipment.

The reasons why entry-level cameras take better photos than high-end cameras are as follows:

Different levels in the later stage have a great influence on the photos, which has nothing to do with the camera grade.

(3) A deep understanding and mastery of the camera and photography itself.

Below are some photos taken by mobile phones.

This is the brain behind the camera at work.