Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Why is Wang Dongling's far-sighted calligraphy ideal so badly sprayed?

Why is Wang Dongling's far-sighted calligraphy ideal so badly sprayed?

Wang Dongling, a famous calligrapher, is a professor and doctoral supervisor of China Academy of Fine Arts. Mr. Wang Dongling is also one of the most controversial calligraphers among netizens in recent years, mainly because of his writing style and methods in recent years.

Because of his writing style in recent years, many scholars, professors and calligraphers who insist on traditional calligraphy can't accept it. For innovation, this kind of body calligraphy is not necessarily an artistic innovation, but also the most unacceptable. Maybe the following methods will make people feel better.

This kind of calligraphy, which combines dance and music, may be more acceptable because it is the fun of a group of unrestrained men dancing. Professor Wang also created a large number of calligraphy works. This method is nicknamed "dancing calligraphy". The second allows netizens to vomit. Wang Dongling can't accept it. His works are called "prose" by netizens. Let's go down and have a look at Professor Wang's works. Maybe you can understand why netizens say this.

Recently, Professor Wang Dongling has been devoted to the creation of this kind of "prose" in recent years. If you see the professor's work in the art gallery, it is difficult to know the content of the work without looking at the introduction next to it. Are traces of comparative painting. I don't know what's inside. This is the third calligraphy exhibition held by Wang Dongling in China Art Museum in 2007, which was specially made according to the exhibition space and visual requirements of the museum.

Therefore, his works also adhere to the traditional style. Looking at Professor Wang's early works, it is not difficult to see that he has done a lot of work in traditional calligraphy. In recent years, his creative style and works have been sprayed out, which is absolutely correct. At the same time, we can't deny that he was once a very capable calligrapher.