Which is sharper, Canon 16 35 or 24 70?

I have used all three elements of Canon. I think the sharpness of 24-70f2.8 is obviously higher than that of 16-35f 2.8, and it is oily and rich in color. These two lenses are high-quality lenses in Canon zoom lenses and have always been the basic standard for many photographers. 2470 is very convenient to shoot in daily life and study. If you take a unit's activities, meetings, employee photos, work records, etc. , is the most suitable lens. So it's a work head, which is no longer appropriate.

Canon 1635 has two apertures, namely 2.8 aperture and 4.0 aperture, which are divided into big ternary and small ternary. The former has appeared in the third generation, and it is a sharp weapon to shoot portraits of scenery and environment, especially the scenery, which is very beautiful. Photographers who like to shoot landscapes, if they are playing Canon, 100% use this lens to shoot landscapes. It is necessary for someone to take portraits, especially outdoor portraits. 1635 not only captures the scenery perfectly, but also blends the characters into nature.

(Photo taken by Canon 70200f2.8)

Which is sharper, Canon 16 35 or 24 70?

Only two lenses are provided to compare their photographic sharpness, which I don't think is appropriate.

In fact, sharpness includes two concepts: resolution and contrast. The sharpness can be improved later, but it is limited by the performance of the equipment itself, the size of the photo output, and the focal length/shooting distance of the lens.

Even with the same shot, some people shoot works with good sharpness, while some friends shoot works with poor sharpness. Therefore, sharpness is a comprehensive embodiment, which is related to the shooting lens, and of course it is also related to the lighting, camera sensitivity and shooting techniques at the shooting site.

Because the landlord raised this question, let's talk about it together with the concept of China rule.

If you shoot in the same light, the sharpness of these two lenses is better than 16-35, and the sharpness of 24-70 is ok, but it is a little worse than 16-35. The main source of this statement is the official evaluation curve of these two shots. To be honest, I don't see any difference. In Canon's large ternary lens, 16-35 and 70-200 are quite good in sharpness, and 24-70 should be ranked last in sharpness method.

The above is my opinion, and friends are welcome to add or comment.

Sword dance image, a photographer who paints, welcome attention and praise. Your support is my motivation.

The pictures in this article are quoted online only to illustrate the meaning of the topic. The copyright belongs to the original author, thank you sincerely.

Which is sharper, Canon 16-35 or 24-70?

Two pictures show that the sharpness of Canon 16-35 exceeds 24-70 heads.

16-35 is an excellent wide-angle zoom lens of Canon, which belongs to one of the three elements. Used in Quan Huafu fuselage to achieve super wide-angle level, used in C-frame fuselage is equivalent to 25.6-56mm, equivalent to the standard zoom lens range.

Your support is my greatest motivation.

Of course, 16 35 has high sharpness.

I was deeply impressed by the overall quality of this EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III. When shooting at the seaside, the lens was accidentally wet by the sea water, but the lens was well sealed, which also provided the possibility for normal work in a worse environment in the future. What makes me most satisfied is that the sharpness of the lens center and edge is excellent, and the maximum aperture of F2.8 can be used safely, thanks to various technologies. EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III is preferred for landscape and architectural photography.

The lens Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L III has fluorite, and the color difference compensation effect is ideal, but the large fluorite lens is difficult to popularize in many lenses because of its high cost. UD (Ultra Low Dispersion) lens developed by Canon is an optical lens with low refraction and low dispersion. The elimination effect of secondary spectrum is improved by using UD lens. Two UD lenses can achieve the same effect as fluorite lenses and have good color difference compensation performance. For the top super wide-angle lens, it is very important to eliminate chromatic aberration, and UD lens is this role.

Overview of canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM lens:

For most beginners, the standard zoom lens is a very good choice. The focal length covers wide-angle to medium-focus, and the scenery is very practical, which can accurately reproduce what you see. If you often shoot indoors or in a shed, this is almost a necessary shot.

The EF 24-70mm/f2.8L released by Canon in 2002 is such a classic zoom lens, with solid workmanship and unique flavor of Canon L fixed focus, which can be called a professional lens. However, due to the relatively weak sharpness at full aperture, many fine powders think that it is the weakest one in Canon's ternary system, and its optical quality is not as good as Nikon's 2470G and Sony's 2470ZA, so its call for upgrading has always been there.

Exactly 10 years later, on the eve of Canon's release of EOS 5D MARK III in March 20 12, Canon finally released EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM: a brand-new optical design for improving image quality, lighter weight and volume, firmer and more sealed mirror body structure, and more humanized design (adding a locking lever to the zoom ring), which made Canon users. Of course, the fly in the ointment is that the second generation did not add anti-shake function as expected. Canon's explanation for this is the out-and-out image quality, but if you look at Canon's telephoto lenses, they are all anti-shake and a little pale.

The focal length is fixed at 35/F 1.4, with large aperture, good sharpness and stable focal length. 16-35, 16 focal length deformation, the deformation will be reduced to 28~30, and it will not be deformed until 35, but if the aperture is not fixed at 35, the focal length will take a photo and take a close-up, 35/F656. You can also use 35 to shoot all kinds of things, 35 is equivalent to what people see, to shoot momentum, to shoot deformation, to shoot the foreground, 16-35 is good, you can't take a group photo, and both sides will be deformed. It is more suitable for taking photos with big heads and circular arcs, which is the best performance to play the perfect role of the lens. No junk lenses and cameras, look at the technology.

Photographic SLR camera accessories comments provide authoritative information and word-of-mouth evaluation of photographic SLR cameras and accessories, improve the matching degree of SLR cameras and accessories, create the best configuration requirements, and create first-class photographic works.

Canon 70-200 2.8 beat

Theoretically, the smaller the zoom range, the higher the quality. 16-35!