Will Canon EOS R5 challenge Sony A9M2 as a sports machine?

The sports machine is the flagship level of SLR, and even the back can't be seen.

The first is all-weather, which is a summary of countless experiences. Without reflection, chickens can't achieve SLR level, and cold, high temperature, hot summer, sandstorm, rain and snow are unbearable for ordinary people. This is the working environment for journalists.

The third is endurance. Needless to say, it can't be shorter.

The fourth is framing. The biggest advantage of optical framing is the whole airspace. Electronic viewfinder without inversion flashes and rolls under fluorescent lamp, and the response is slow when it is cold. But the SLR can work under any circumstances, so the function is less than that without inversion.

Fifth, focus. Don't think that focusing without full-screen focusing is awesome. The essence of focusing is fast and accurate. High-speed continuous shooting has its own emphasis. Don't underestimate the SLR focusing module, play professionally.

Finally, no reflection will replace SLR, saying it is a substitute. Actually, I'd better change the medicine. The only way is to cancel the reflection system. Time depends on when electronic framing and focusing can catch up with SLR. At present, it will take some time.

Most people who really play photography still use SLR, mostly middle-aged and elderly people. Mainly considering videos, most of them are young people. In the circle of actually playing photography, it is still dominated by SLR. Although SLR is not as good as it is now, it is large in quantity, and the performance of SLR 10 years ago is still not far behind. However, no inversion is mainly based on video. The performance and function of video ten years ago were far worse than now, so the frequency without reverse switching is very fast. SLR has no chance, yes! Moreover, there is a great chance that it can be easily transplanted to SLR without anti-function. If the short board of SLR video is solved, then SLR can still resist. Canon r5 takes the video function to a new level, but it's almost the same. There is a professional video player, and better video performance shows that a more powerful processing system is needed. Think of Apple's MacPro as a video, starting at 50,000. Too powerful videos will restrict consumption, and the future is hard to say.

SonyA9 can't compare with Canon R5 and SLR flagship. Although there are many early adopters, price and use limit sales. R5 is very powerful, but its power is only reflected in its powerful video performance, so neither of them can replace the role of SLR flagship.

number

People engaged in sports photography are relatively fixed and professional, and they are not a person, but a photography department. For a long time, they have accumulated a whole set of systems, such as the telephoto of the fuselage. Changing the fuselage means changing the system, which is too expensive.

Sports photography is mainly based on Canon Nikon. In the past two years, Sony wants to enter this field, and a few people have entered Sony early, which has not yet become a climate.

Say R5 challenges A92, this question just doesn't hold water, borrow the title of R5.

Not long ago, the Associated Press replaced Sony equipment. Does that mean it doesn't take sports photos and videos?

The original question is whether the 45-megapixel full-width R5 micro-sheet challenges the position of the 24-megapixel full-width A9M2 micro-sheet as a sports machine. I didn't see the original question: Where is the flagship performance of the Quan Huafu optical viewfinder SLR that challenges the shooting of sports? Quan Huafu SLR flagship has the strongest performance in shooting sports photos, which is not contradictory to A9R6 Quan Huafu micro-single, right?

I am optimistic that the full-size R6 micro-single can take sports photos, and R5 is a high-pixel micro-single. Look at the promotion of Canon China official website, which is aimed at the positioning of the 5-series SLR market. According to the price of 26,000 yuan, it is not the positioning of the flagship of 1 series SLR. R6 is the sensor that transforms the flagship of 1DX3 SLR. Using the flagship processor of 1DX3 SLR, the high-speed continuous shooting performance of 20 megapixels and the price of 16000 yuan may challenge A9 to take sports photos.

If it is at -5-30 degrees, the micro-sequence is still very good, but below MINUS 10 degrees, above 30 degrees, there will be no resistance, endurance and fever.

Two sports machines can't do SLR, where is the challenge?

At present, the biggest disadvantage of micro-single is snapshot and battery life. Who will capture sports with a micro-sheet?

Motion 1DX3 or D6

A9m2 has no position [covering her face]