Who is better, Canon A63 or 57?

both are good. the A63 has 8 million pixels, the CCD is larger (1/1.8 inch), and the imaging quality is better. moreover, it has a 2.5-inch reversible LCD screen, which makes it more convenient to take pictures at special angles. Using 4 batteries, the body is slightly heavier, but the standby time is longer.

the selling point of p>A57 IS DIGIC III and is optical image stabilization. DIGIC III makes A57 have faster response speed, better noise reduction performance and facial focusing function. Optical anti-shake can improve the success rate of shooting in low light, or shoot at a lower ISO to improve the image quality.

In contrast, A63 is more suitable for junior photographers who are pursuing photography, while A57 is more suitable for ordinary amateur home users. Which one to choose depends on your own needs.

supplement: haha, brother, I said that the CCD of A63 is 1/1.8 inch, which is larger than that of A57, which is 1/2.5 inch. Do you have any different opinions?

when it comes to power consumption, A57 may not save more electricity than A63. The IS function will increase power consumption, and there are two batteries missing. As for the 4 shots you said, it may be the official data you read, telling you that this number will never be reached in the hands of users. Even if you use a 25mAh battery, it is very good to take 2 pictures in general, and it is almost the same to take 1 pictures if you have more playback and other operations, hehe.

Supplement: IXUS series is good because of its size and appearance, small and beautiful, and metal shell. However, the imaging quality and price are not as good as A series, because making the camera small will inevitably increase the cost and sacrifice the imaging quality. If you are interested in imaging quality and cost performance, A series is better (S series and G series are better than A series).