Nikon machine is better. What is Nikon df?

the more expensive, the better. D4 in production is of course the best.

the shape of p>DF is F3, not F4. CMOS is the same as D4, but the focusing is much worse than that of continuous shooting, and there is no camera function. In Nikon's advertisement, it is said that the "pure" photography of this machine owner is rooted in the problem of heat dissipation of the small body, so the camera function is removed. The main target of this machine is literary users who prefer retro, or people who care about the lightness of the fuselage.

cost-effective:

D4, top focus, top workmanship, high-speed continuous shooting and high ISO, suitable for shooting sports, news, outdoor ecology, wedding follow-up and other harsh shooting environments. Of course, the general theme is also handy, and the color, especially the skin color and texture of people, is better than that of D8 models of the same era. The disadvantage is that the pixels are not high.

D8/D8E, with high pixels and excellent focusing and photometry, is mainly aimed at photo studios, users with fever/professional landscape photography, but the disadvantage is that the cost of matching lenses is relatively high.

D61: an entry-level full-frame camera, with good ISO, moderate pixels and light body, is suitable for ordinary lovers, especially those who like to travel. In addition, Nikon has improved the white balance algorithm, which theoretically performs better on people's skin color and texture. One disadvantage is that the focus is not top-notch, the focus distribution area is small, and the speed and dark focus are not as good as D8. The second is that the maximum shutter is only 1/4.

D71 is Nikon's high-end clipping machine, with good body workmanship and control, shutter (but half a gear worse than the old D3S), and top-level focusing. Compared with D53, it has more functions of professional machines, such as D8 for the highest shutter speed and the highest synchronization speed of flash, double impeller, etc., which are mainly aimed at birdshooting and macro enthusiasts, as well as some people who are not sensitive to the whole picture. One disadvantage is that it is not full-width, the second is that high ISO is not powerful, and the third is that the fuselage is not very light (but not too heavy).

D53: entry-level model, focusing is similar to that of D61, not top-notch, but it is much improved compared with the previous generation, with a light body, which is suitable for ordinary photographers, macro enthusiasts and people who care about the weight of equipment. High ISO doesn't work. The synchronization speed of shutter and flash is the same as that of D61. Compared with D71, it lacks some professional functions, such as flashing with a set-top flash, and the import function of Nikon's exposure curve (but the curve can be loaded on a computer). It seems that there is no histogram display yet, and the control is much worse than that of D71. However, considering this price, the cost performance is very high.

the frame cutter is equivalent to cutting a part of the photosensitive element of the full-width machine, so the distribution area of the focus on the full-width machine is small, but there is no such problem on the frame cutter.