What are the criteria for judging photographic works? What is the core?

There are two parts to judging a photographic work: \r\n 1. Surface vision part. \ r \ The emphasis is on composition, lighting, color, subject control and so on. \r\n Composition is to use human visual inertia and the characteristics of the subject to create a picture with visual sensing and suggestive effects. Although the textbook has written composition rules, there is no standard for composition, and master's works often "violate" the composition rules of the textbook. \ r \ Use light, photography is the art of using light. Light with different angles, strengths, soft and hard properties can create various effects. It is a sign of a master to master all kinds of artificial light and natural light and embody them perfectly in his works. \ r \ color, the understanding and utilization of color is a basic skill. Although the rules of color matching in textbooks are not mandatory standards, we can learn people's visual psychology about color. Photographers and designers must master the basic theory of color. What you haven't learned can be seen at a glance by taking photos. \ r \ Control of the theme. Including the dead and the living, understand the characteristics of the subject and conceive the expression. Only by understanding each other's personality and being good at communication and guidance can we make a work with personality charm. It's a little harder to shoot alive than dead. \r\n2. The meaning behind it. \ r \ works have profound meaning, even the story behind them, which is the characteristic of advanced photography. People can feel the joys and sorrows from the pictures and relate them to a story. This part is the hardest. Once it is done, the visual part of the surface such as composition and color can be almost ignored, which is why many masters' works often "violate" the rules, which are not beautiful on the surface, but their works are thought-provoking.