Why is the pear animation being scolded to death, but no one dares to scold it in today's headlines?

I wonder what pear animation does. I only talk about the two websites from a personal point of view, which is not objective and is for reference only.

As for Bili Bili, we can see from the data given on the Internet that the age survey results of active users of Bili Bili show that their age is mainly distributed in the group born in 1995-2009, and they are very young. And this involves several other issues.

Looking at the ratings of Altman series in previous years with 65438+ born in 0995 (+5=2000), we will find that even in Japan, its ratings have always been problematic. Or from Eddie (80), its ratings dropped slightly. Compared with the previous works, which broke the average rating of 10% at the earliest, Pavat's average rating in 1995 was dismal by half.

If we can directly find the average age from 1995 to 2009 (+5=2007), the average audience rating of Severn Altman X released in that year is 1.6%, the lowest audience rating is 1. 1%, and the highest audience rating is 2.4%. It is no exaggeration to say that it is the worst ultraman series ever.

Is Altman rubbish? We can't think so, but it first faces the problem of time and cultural identity. As the "Internet (Z) generation" group from 1995 to 2009, they eliminated the old information at an amazing speed. There is also the Altman series ... If it is ugly, it is just one of the manifestations of a "short-lived" monster culture craze based on Godzilla, which was engraved by Bendo, after the continuous problems of 1954.

Moreover, its embodiment combined with the Japanese unique illusion of being killed will form a spread for more than 60 years. But among them, Altman is neither absolutely unique nor always the best. Therefore, if we think that, for example, the first broadcast time of the Altman series in Chinese mainland is 1993, then the calculation (+5= 1998) shows that users from 1995 to 2009 have reason to have more Altman dead fans ... Maybe this is a bit illusory, and all kinds of related thoughts are illusory.

————

Today's headlines are actually not optimistic. Today's headlines have a lot of traffic, including the combination of platforms such as watermelon video. The first thing it brings is "high fault tolerance rate". Each viewer only watches an article or video produced by the media once, even if it is not the same article, it may bring more time to the creators than other platforms.

Then, as a platform with large traffic, its content is bound to be richer, which is also a kind of "high fault tolerance rate" thinking. Few people will deliberately care about the problems of a single manufacturer. It is common to be uninterested or blocked. Learning more information in a shorter time (swallowing dates) may be what today's headline users need, while Li Li is more like a circle of friends, picky and more concerned.

Therefore, the question to think about here should be, as background data, do you reach a reasonable threshold by comparing the number of fans, the amount of play, the duration and the comments? Secondly, what needs to be considered is, in such a "whale swallowing" platform, how likely it is to be promoted to a producer after removing freshness or other factors? After all, articles or videos of the same level may be dangerous if they are not changed for more than a few months. You can't change a new bottle of old bar repeatedly?

Therefore, the concepts of "dare to scold" and "scold to death" are too superficial.