Which is better, Sony A7R II or Leica SL?

As a camera enthusiast, Sony a7r II is definitely better than Leica sl, and Sony a7r II is worth starting with. Let's share my opinion with you.

1. pixel contrast

Sony A7R II is a miniature camera with 24.3 megapixel ExmorCMOS image sensor, which comes from Quan Huafu. It has a very high image quality and will never lose to Quan Huafu SLR camera. A7R II is equipped with an enhanced hybrid autofocus system, which combines the advantages of 1 17-point phase detection autofocus system and 25-point fast intelligent autofocus system, and can detect the focus direction and focus target more accurately. The size is 126.9x94.4x48.2mm, and the weight is about 4 16g.

Leica SL is equipped with16 megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, equivalent focal length of 345gmm f/2.8 fixed-focus lens, 2.7 "230,000 pixel LCD screen, sensitivity of ISO 100- 12500, RAW format support, external electronic viewfinder (EVF) and handle support SD. In contrast, Sony a7r has 24.3 million pixels, which is significantly higher than Lycra SL's16 million pixels, so Sony A7R II is good.

2. Frame contrast

Leica SL is APSC and Sony a7r is Quan Huafu. The bigger the frame, the better. Sony a7r is compatible with NEX series APSC lens, and it is shooting APSC frame. From this point of view, Sony a7r is not as good as Leica SL, but if Sony a7r is equipped with Quan Huafu lens, it is much larger than Leica SL in frame. There is a saying in our photography world that "thumbnails have no dog heads", which means that photos taken by any camera are very good if viewed from thumbnails, so Sony a7r+.

3. Performance comparison

Cameras after Sony A7 series have 5-axis anti-shake function, which is so powerful that you can lose the bulky tripod most of the time.

Leica camera manufacturing technology and lens optical quality have been at the forefront. The camera body is relatively strong and can be used for many years. The lens feels good, and most of the lenses are fixed-focus lenses with large aperture, which is suitable for slow shooting and cultural shooting. It is not good at sports shooting, and the film is delicate in color. Most people call it "German flavor", which is one of the reasons why everyone pursues Leica. But Leica cameras don't have many functions and are expensive.

Examples around you

I remember a friend of mine playing Leica and Sony at the same time. After Leica SL went on the market, I bought one and went out to play and sell it.

Then I bought a Sony A7R II camera, and I asked him why. He said that the color of Leica is too ugly, although I don't quite understand what an ugly color is, because everyone has different views on color; But the color of Sony a7r film is really pleasing, so I can't help it!

Summary: On the whole, Sony should be better. These two brands are old brands in the camera industry, and both brands are excellent. Of course, we should pay attention to some differences between them when choosing. Both brands have their own advantages. Generally speaking, Sony is better if it is cost-effective. From the perspective of manufacturing technology and imaging, Leica's German technology is very rigorous and the color is very tasty.