Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Why is the skin with a filter score of 20 praised and the skin with a high-definition camera score of 80 praised as poor?

Why is the skin with a filter score of 20 praised and the skin with a high-definition camera score of 80 praised as poor?

Don't pay too much attention to these scoring systems.

Explain the reason:

It is true that various mito tools are now flooding, and "artifacts" such as filters are emerging one after another, so there is no need to worry about the subject. I remember Qu Ping chatting with the fisherman, everyone was drunk, and the reason why I woke up alone was actually similar to this. Most people splurge on it, so don't worry about it.

Many grading apps are irresponsible, completely chaotic and have little reference (please ignore this one if the subject uses a formal method). For example, the photo of age measurement, the same one may be 18 later, so it is meaningless.

Is there any solution: just ignore it, wish the subject beautiful and hope to adopt it.