What's the difference between Canon eos 1d3 and eosr5? How to choose?

Sorry, I haven't used micro-sheets, so I can't compare them. Thank you!

What's the difference between Canon eos 1d3 and eosr5? How to choose? Canon EOS R5 is mainly positioned as a professional camera.

Hello, let me talk about my views and suggestions:

First, the positioning of Canon EOS 1DX3 and EOS R5 is really different.

1, EOS 1DX3, mainly positioned as the flagship of sports, especially suitable for use with professional machine gun lenses. In daily use, big ternary is also the basic configuration of 1DX3.

As far as the sales target is concerned, 1DX3 is mainly sold to news organizations.

As far as the majority of photographers are concerned, almost only bird photographers will buy the 1DX3 fuselage.

2, EOS R5, the main positioning is a professional camera, of course, taking pictures is also very good.

Second, the era of Canon 1DX3 is gradually passing.

It should be said that in the next 2-3 years, 1DX3 can still be the mainstream model of sports photography.

But after 3-5 years, 1DX3 and its subsequent models will hardly become the mainstream models of sports photography.

Even for 1DX3, whether there is a follow-up model is a big problem! It is very likely that 1DX3 has no follow-up model!

Third, for photographers who mainly only take pictures, the cost performance of EOS R5 is indeed a bit low.

Because many people don't need strong camera performance.

Obviously, Sony A7R3 or Sony A7R4 is more suitable for photographers and enthusiasts who don't take pictures very much.

4. Canon EOS R6 is also a good choice if you don't take photos of sports photography and birds which are too difficult.

In fact, for the editors of the current media center, Canon EOS R6 will be a more realistic choice.

In fact, most editors in the media center will not cover the Olympic Games or world-class sports competitions.

To sum up, at present 1DX3 and R5 are not suitable for purchase unless there is a very clear demand.

As far as the current situation is concerned, it will be a more appropriate choice to wait for the party and wait for about half a year before making a decision.

I'm afraid the camera model is wrong. 1D3 has been discontinued for many years. The subject said it should be 1D3.

Difference 1: 1 DXLL SLR; R5 is not negative. These are two types of models.

Difference 2: 1 dxill professional flagship model; R5 high-end consumer models.

Difference 3: 1DX ⅲ focuses on photography, taking speed as the benchmark, and sports, news reports, wild animals, birds and other themes can best reflect its value; R5 gives priority to video, taking into account photography, and the video function is the first. The 8-level anti-shake of the fuselage+lens is also groundbreaking.

Difference 4: 1DXⅲ costs 4.7W, and R5 costs 2.6W The price does not include the lens.

As for how to choose, please decide according to the demand.

1dx3 is mostly used for documentary and sports photography, and it is also the most powerful, sturdy, expensive and bulky camera of Canon. If it is used for the above content, it is almost the only choice, but besides, considering the economic and physical burden, it is only 20 million pixels, which just fills the 5k display screen, which is really not creative enough to use. Of course, it doesn't mean that 20 million pixels can't be made, but it doesn't need to pay such a big price (including the burden of going out later). It is enough to choose r6 as the same sensor, and the performance is more than enough for taking pictures.

R5 is a camera for photography creation. 4500w pixels can meet the demand of resolution improvement for many years to come. And there is no anti-reflection system, and there are more and more powerful lenses to choose from. Of course, this does not mean that its performance is low. It is still the second best camera in Canon, and it also has anti-shake and 8k video capabilities that 1dx3 does not have. Although the latter is not very practical, it is better than nothing.

A SLR, a micro-single,

1dx3 is too expensive and heavy, and the pixel is not high, so it is not recommended to buy it.

R5 is too expensive, and rf lens is too expensive at present, so it is not recommended to buy it.

At present, SLR is still recommended. The main RF lens is too expensive, including the adapter ring.

Personally recommended Canon 6d2 is basically enough.

Eosr5, this machine, video is just a gimmick of the manufacturer, and other functions are OK. Took 8K video, it's useless. The TV, computer and mobile phone at home do not support 8K, so it is impossible to play images with 8K quality.

Many people compare 45 million pixels with 20 million pixels here. You should know that pixels are not the only factor that determines the image quality. We can see that 1 dxi is not inferior to R5 in image quality, especially in network communication.