Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - 1+1=Why is it equal to 3?
1+1=Why is it equal to 3?
When you ask others: "Under what circumstances does 1+1 = 3". Most people must think that this is a "brain teaser" problem, or that it is a philosophical problem of "adding a glass of water to a glass of water" or "adding a pile of sand to a pile". But will "3" appear in this way? Some people even thought of the answer "a man and a woman give birth to a child"! In fact, things are not that complicated at all. This is just an elementary school math problem! In elementary school-level mathematics, when rounding from 4 to 5, there is nearly 1/3 but less than 1/3 of the probability that 1+1=3, from 1.1 to 1.4 (I now only use one decimal place) In terms of digits) when rounding from 4 to 5, it is still "1". For example, 1.2+1.3 is =2.5. If it is rounded from 4 to 5, it must be "3". By analogy, from 1.1 to 1.4, how many combinations are there? It can be 1.1+1.4. Similarly, 1.4+1.4 is also true, and 1.3+1.4 is also true. As long as the result is greater than or equal to 2.5 or above, it is true.
Excluding the two numbers 1 and 1.5, the probability is less than 1/3. Because the real "1+1" can only =2; but "1.5+1.5" is the real =3!
Under the above conditions, "1+1.5" cannot be established, and "1.5" becomes "2" when 4 is rounded to 5. Of course, what we are talking about here is the problem of "1+1=3"! Extending to all aspects of society and other aspects, there are even more problems. "1+1=3" is mathematically established, and in real society, this phenomenon is not uncommon. In fact, "1+1=3", is this "3" really "3"?
At the same time, since when rounding from 4 to 5, "1+1=3" has a 1/3 probability of being true. Then there is also a 1/3 probability of "1+1=1"! Think about it again: 0.5 or above, is it "1" when rounding from 4 to 5? Therefore, since it is accepted that "1+1=3" is established, we must also admit that "1+1=1" is also established! However, the vast majority of people in our shameless society are happy when they are the vested interests of "1+1=3". But when he sometimes gets reduced to "1+1=1" he screams "unfair"!
This is a Chinese-style "plundering method". The "being" in society...is based on this principle. Similarly, there are some shameless people who deliberately forget how they got their "3" and take it for granted that 3+3=6, but is their "3" really 3? , when he was in "1+1=3", he said, "How can there be so many 'fair' things in this world?" However, when he used this "3" to do "3+3", the result was only Can "=5". He jumped out and said "unfair" again!
We Guangzhou people usually say "Eat salted fish to satisfy your thirst" and northerners say "Be willing to accept defeat". This is a correct outlook on life. But can the current Chinese do it? Ask others to be "1+1=2" and think that you should be "1+1=3". When "1+1=1" happens to others, they say, "How can there be so much fairness in this world?" Some officials even publicly say, "If there is so much fairness in the world, then how can it be?! ( Typical Chinese characteristics)" But when he was in the situation of "1+1=1", he shouted "unfair"! Don't forget, you are doing the first grade of junior high school, while others are doing the fifteenth grade. But Chinese people always think about "losing and winning"! Someone asked me: What does "1+1=3" have to do with photography? Why do you always ask this question during the exam for apprenticeship (free of charge)?
This is very commonly used in landscape photography. Many of the truly immortal works use this technique, which is "moving the focus forward to 'expand' the depth of field." scope" approach. It's just that each author expresses it differently based on his or her own level of knowledge and understanding. At the same time, if the author makes such a straightforward statement, it will only attract the disapproval of the vast majority of people. When I was studying photography art at Guangzhou Engineering Vocational and Technical College, Teacher Tan Zhengrong taught us this photography technique during the "Landscape Photography" class, but it was considered "nonsense" by everyone (no I think so publicly and privately). Because this creative technique itself takes advantage of human visual errors. The essence of artistic creation is a kind of visual artistic communication.
And I always want to ask this question, not whether the person knows or understands this photography technique or principle, but whether his thinking can break out of the inherent conceptual circles of ordinary people.
What's more important is that he understands: Don't make something that is simple become complicated!
- Related articles
- How to make a poster? How to create character posters? What are the design methods?
- Introduction of Guangzhou Sunrise Tourist Attractions Introduction Video of Guangzhou Sunrise Tourist Attractions
- Which is more fun, beijing museum of natural history or Planetarium?
- Who is Chen Mankai?
- Brief introduction of China's mentor in the third season of Cenozoic era
- Who has a profile of physicist J. Frank?
- The world is wonderful, essays.
- Want to match a desktop computer host for accounting?
- Kyle, the immortal bird, confronted Kprusoian head-on, whose fruit is more powerful?
- What are the smells of YSL opium and Dior poison?