What is the breath feeling of shoulder photography in movies?

Shoulder, can you call it free? Camera? Hands? Holding, etc., from my personal point of view, can be used for the following purposes. 1. Save money. 2. Save time? .

3. Are directors and photographers lazy or really not good at it? 4. Slight breath jitter can make the picture closer to "reality", thus narrowing the distance between the audience and the movie. 5. Violent shaking can increase the rhythm of the picture in time, making the picture more uncertain, nervous and unsafe.

For a film like District 9, the purpose of choosing hand-made style is obvious: the film is presented in a semi-recorded or pseudo-recorded way. In order to imitate the immediacy of "documentary", I naturally chose a more realistic hand-held style.

Simply recording images with devices can be traced back to the earliest Homevideo? Tape recorder, which became DV. Our eyes have seen more DV "records", so we have a definition of "records", so it feels more real when we hold it. If we assume that our hands are as steady as a chicken's head and everything we shoot with DV is like a tripod and a track, then the "realism" brought by the natural "hand-held style" will no longer exist. As a qualified director or photographer, every shoulder should have a reason. The reason must come from the story itself. As for whether too many shoulders will make the film have no style.

This technique should be used more in subjective shooting, especially backhand subjective shooting, which is more suitable for the audience's experience, the degree of shaking and how to shake. This is directly related to the emotional atmosphere. The choice of lens language has certain basis. In order to use it reasonably, the masters combined with years of experience and talent on the basis of basic skills to create unique skills of lens and film language expression. Personally, I think it is not advisable to blindly pursue the so-called personal style.