The relationship between photography and painting is 400 words.

The relationship between photography and painting is 400 words. 1. The characteristics of photography and painting.

(1) Having the same artistic features.

Painter and photographer Hu made an incisive exposition on the artistic commonness between photography and painting in Art Photography. He pointed out that photography "is also a new art, and its aesthetic feeling is no different from other arts." "In the past, people called paintings the best and said they were lifelike. It is particularly appropriate to use this language as an explanation of artistic photography. " In the classification of art forms, photography and painting mostly belong to the same category: if based on the existence of art forms, photography and painting belong to space art; From the way of perception, both belong to visual art; If it is based on the way of creation, both belong to plastic arts; On the relationship between reflecting objective reality and expressing objective emotion, they can be brought into the category of reproduction art at the same time. In addition, they also have the same artistic features as modeling, vision, space, stillness and instantaneity. Modeling is to shape three-dimensional objects in two-dimensional space through light, shadow, color, point, line and surface, thus depicting the external form of things; Visibility refers to the existence of visual images in his works, so that readers can understand his works with visual images; Spatiality is displayed in space, and it should occupy a certain space in the way of existence; Static indicates that the artistic image it creates is static; Instantaneity refers to only one instantaneous state of things.

(b) Have the same visual stereoscopic impression.

Both photography and painting create a three-dimensional sense of vision through plane depiction. They are different from sculptures, but get rid of the space occupied by material entities, compress them into planes to express them, act on the viewer's visual feeling habits, and create a three-dimensional "illusion" form. That is to say, photography and painting are originally plane shapes, but with the help of light, color, tone, lines and composition rhythm, they present a three-dimensional sense of abrupt ups and downs. Not only that, because the author casts his own thoughts on life in his works and expresses his emotions of joys, sorrows, love and hate, it can arouse the similar and identical emotional experience of the appreciator, arouse the association of the appreciator, break through the inherent connotation of the object, create moral power and artistic significance beyond the object, and make the limited instant image receive infinite effect and show a sense of historical depth.

(3) It also shows the instantaneity of life.

Photographic painting should capture the typical moments in the long river of life, choose a certain space for the content to be expressed, and solidify it by materialized means to form an artistic image with perfect mental outlook and essential significance. Generally speaking, this kind of mode should reveal some truth of life through moral strength and artistic charm, reflect some essence and depth of life, and cause a sense of continuous movement in time; It is required that at the moment when the depicted object moves, at a turning moment, some things in the past and about to happen are condensed in one picture in an instant, thus reflecting one side of life. Therefore, in the whole creative process, it requires the author to choose special details with distinctive personality and profound life connotation from the most typical and effective moments of things development, time loss and life change, grasp the inevitability of life, boldly eliminate those accidental non-essential phenomena, inject the emulsion of the author's mind through strict processing and transformation, and create an artistic image with a unique life style.

(d) Have the same space to live side by side.

Photography and painting, as two-dimensional plane plastic arts, can display intertwined things, various forms of multi-bodies, flowing movements, people's inner feelings and colorful scenery side by side on a plane through colors, lines and light and shade, forming a harmonious and perfect whole. This visual intuition of photography and painting works makes people accept colorful living space at a glance. For example, the Russian painter Lie Bin's Tracker on the Volga River juxtaposes several scenes on the same plane: low gray clouds, a group of trackers bent down to carry heavy loads, a huge hull moving slowly in the middle, a sail on the left and a steamboat braving mist and smoke on the right. Although the appreciator needs to think deeply before he can appreciate the spiritual connotation of seclusion in the depths of the picture, the tracker and Yun Fan are clear at a glance, which makes them very visible and sensible.

Second, the different characteristics of photography and painting.

(A) differences in the use of materials, media and materials

The materials and media used in photography and painting are very different. Photography is the product of scientific and technological civilization, and the art of photography has great dependence on technology and equipment. The photographic tool is a high-precision optical signal collector, and the film is a chemical optical signal memory. From the perspective of creating images, not only photographers but also cameras are involved in photography creation. Without a camera, there would be no photography, and there would be no photography art, while painting takes pigments, brushes and canvases (paper) as media materials, with low scientific and technological content. Mainly depends on the artist's "craft" and the artist's mind. The painter's palette and brush are not the same as the camera, and the brush has no direct imaging ability. The camera can capture the image directly without going through the drawing stage, because photography is supported by optical technology and mechanical technology, but painting is not, which leads to the different technical connotations of photographers and painters. The painter's technology is a kind of "craft", and the photographer's technology is the ability to master and control the camera and darkroom processing technology. Photography has strict requirements for equipment, such as cameras, photosensitive materials, chemicals, magnifying processors, etc. These are the crystallization of modern science and technology, so the dependence of photography on equipment is, in the final analysis, the dependence on technology. As Andreas Faninger said, "Every good photo is a successful and comprehensive combination of technology and art".

(B) differences in modeling methods

Generally speaking, painting and photography create visual images through the modeling of light, shadow, color, point, line and surface. But physically speaking, the "light" in painting is just a metaphor, a color composed of pigments, and an "illusion of light" expressed by color; The light of photography is the real light, "the hue and color produced by the physical and chemical induction of light" Therefore, "light" is the most important material for photographic art modeling. In photography creation, what is related to correct exposure is how photographers use light. If exposure shows more dependence on equipment and technology, then using "light" is mainly an artistic problem. A painter can paint as long as he has "light"; But for photography, there is no shadow without light. In the eyes of photographers, light is the pigment in the hands of painters.

(C) the performance of instantaneous differences

Once an object is selected in photography, it will be taken into the lens as it is and left on the photographic film, and this "click" moment is impossible to repeat. Photography is to see with a lens and capture the truth with "light", which is the art of truly grasping the moment. Painting is also to express the moment in life, which is essentially different from the moment in photography. The moment of painting is caught with the eyes, stored in the brain, and then expressed with a pen. The reality of this moment has great drift, which is not so much an "instant" as an "impression".

When the subject is in the shadow, the color tone is often dark and the three-dimensional sense is not good. We can use the reflector to reflect the sunlight from the sunny place to the face and body of the subject, so as to improve their light receiving ability and make the light and light beneficial to the modeling of the characters.

(d) Differences in performance methods and technical processes

Photography captures the "moments" of life quickly, but painting is slow. It often takes a painter ten days and a half months or even a year and a half or even longer to reproduce the impression left in his mind. In the way of expression, painting is flexible, concrete, abstract, realistic and romantic; Photography, on the other hand, can only capture the instantaneous scenes in life realistically. However, the scenes in real life are always loose and accidental. To connect unrelated things, or to find the necessary connection from a lot of accidental things, so that disorder becomes orderly, which requires photographers to shoot selectively. The unrepeatable moment of photography determines that photographers should capture, discover and wait for the light that conforms to their own aesthetic thoughts and find the angle that conforms to their own intentions. This selectivity also determines the photographer's ability to understand light, real moments and things.

3. The relationship between photography and painting

The procedural facts of contemporary art tell us that when an artistic expression form and style are bored by people's long-term appreciation, they often need diversified skills and expressions to adapt to it, so art constantly innovates or abandons stylized technical norms and inherent aesthetic models, or absorbs nutrition from other artistic forms as supplements and updates, so as to construct new styles and new aesthetic videos to meet people's new aesthetic needs. It is an indisputable fact that the horizontal infiltration and absorption between various art categories is becoming an innovative way, especially in today's constantly updated artistic concepts and aesthetic concepts. Similarly, photography and painting are no exception.

In the process of the simultaneous development of openness and diversity of contemporary plastic arts, photography and painting consciously and unconsciously show multi-directional artistic blending in the collision and intersection. From some works with far-reaching artistic conception, we can see their complementary factors and characteristics. For example, photographer Lin Sen's Nostalgia of Water Town (won the gold medal in the 9th International Film Festival) and Zhu Dingjia's Responsibility Field of Miao Family (see the 13th Collection of Photographic Art Works in China), whose images condense the charm of Chinese painting and the knife marks of prints; Sun's Auspicious shows the characteristics of rough brushwork in oil painting. American photographer Michael's Scenery and Still Life is permeated with the mixed effect of color contrast and color juxtaposition in impressionist painting. Another example is Bamboo by China painter Cheng Shifa, Inflow by American painter Qiu Yang, Meaningless Choice by Song LingNo. 12, and People Going to the World by Wang Huaiqing, all of which absorbed and integrated the forms of photography to varying degrees.

In addition, judging from the history of human art development, the expression media, language, means and skills of any art have been constantly developing and changing throughout the ages. Among them, it runs through the absorption, reference, transformation and innovation of different arts in the collision and intersection. In particular, "Modern art obviously tends to absorb, draw lessons from and synthesize the characteristics of other art categories, which makes it more pregnant" (in Zhu Yujun). The existence and development of photography art, as well as a large number of artistic practices, have proved that it absorbs the strengths of other arts, especially painting, absorbs the essence and complements each other. By fully mobilizing the means of expression of photography art, it reflects the complex and diverse forms of real things in many directions and becomes a new factor in creation, with the aim of making itself more inclusive and vague.

Then, will the communication, interaction, mutual influence and mutual penetration between arts lose their artistic characteristics? That was not the case. As we all know, painting is a sister art of photography. Photography has been influenced by painting since its birth. Many basic skills of painting, such as the grasp of light and shade, the understanding and application of color, the choice of composition and so on. , are used by photographers. People with basic knowledge of painting can be familiar with the photography industry in many aspects, and get twice the result with half the effort. Especially in the process of photography and the later darkroom processing of photographic images, they will integrate painting skills into photography and images because of their kindness or preference for painting characteristics. The resulting video works have brought many picturesque feelings to photography, and made many new breakthroughs in darkroom technology. There are many successful examples in this regard. In addition, photography is also used in literature, drama and music. However, it has not been assimilated by painting or other arts, nor has it lost its essential characteristics as a unique art form, nor has it caused any crisis. On the contrary, these assimilations have played a beneficial role in enhancing the vitality and vitality of photography, enriching and expanding its artistic means and developing its expression forms. Painting was influenced by photography, but it did not die out. On the contrary, it urges itself to explore artistic goals again. Photography and painting coexist and complement each other, which does not mean obliterating or weakening their own artistic characteristics and quality, but also helps to enrich their aesthetic structure.

The famous cubist artist Lott wrote as early as the first World Photography Exhibition: "In a century, this machine will be a brush, a palette, colors, dexterity, habits, patience, sharp eyes, brushstrokes, pigments, transparent colors, know-how, three-dimensional effects, accuracy and realism." (0l32- 133) Kang Shiwei, a contemporary photographer, also said in his monograph "Photographic Prints" that the realistic record of photography and the knife method of printmaking constitute the dual aesthetic taste of photographic prints. It can be seen that the combination of photography and painting, realism and freehand brushwork adopted by photographers not only shows their new aesthetic pursuit and artistic interest, but also makes up for their own shortcomings and corrects their deviations, so as to master new techniques and show diverse aesthetic interests.

Man ray (1890- 1976), an American artist and photographer, once made such a classic explanation on the relationship between photography and painting: "I shoot what I don't want to paint, and paint what I can't shoot." This creed profoundly reveals the complementary relationship between painting and photography. At the same time, Man Lei's dual identity as a painter and photographer also proves the close marriage between painting and photography in practice.

When discussing the "artistic synthesis" of novels, Zhong Benkang, a literary theorist, once mentioned that all arts are always created according to the laws of beauty and the thoughts and feelings that artists feel, experience and realize. Therefore, it is not surprising that the mutual revelation, infiltration, synthesis and integration of various arts conform to the inherent laws of art.

In fact, the new artistic language, expression techniques and skills displayed in the works after artistic blending not only reflect the artist's courage and innovative spirit to explore beauty, but also include the creativity, imagination and difficult and complicated artistic transformation process of the creative subject. More importantly, photography and painting complement, enrich and perfect their respective art forms in the integration of visual language, expression techniques and art forms. It broadens the possibility of diversified combination of visual elements and free materialization of aesthetic images, thus promoting the creative subject to create artistic images more deeply and express rich artistic connotations. For example, the master photographer Lang Jingshan's "Range Rover on the Lakes and Mountains" borrowed the expression form of China's traditional painting to combine the scenery of different time and space in the same photo in an orderly way, staggered and dense, just like an ink-and-wash landscape scroll painting, especially a scattered perspective. In the "Universe and Life Series" shot by Jiang Biao, the author also absorbed and integrated the new spatial combination and perspective relationship of modern painting from the analysis of the picture structure. The new structure and tone color enhance the sense of form of the work, deepen the artistic connotation of the picture and form a strong artistic tension. Therefore, this group of exploratory photos contains extremely rich aesthetic content, has the artistic power of shocking the soul, and gives people a novel and unique aesthetic feeling.

With the rapid development of modern society and the high development of science and technology, the relationship between photography and painting is undergoing profound changes today with the continuous expansion of artistic connotation and extension. Under the new historical conditions, the integration of the two will be a long-term cultural phenomenon, which has become an obvious trend of contemporary film and television creation and will be full of vitality.

What is the relationship between photography and painting? When it comes to photography and painting, the most sensitive word is "truth". The invention of photography has a great influence on modern painting, both conceptually and functionally, but there are always some careful people who sensitively grasp the difference between the two.

However, there may be only a thin line between photography and painting. If photography is not only recording images, but also creating works, then it is closely related to painting.

In modern times, quite a few photographers use the lens as a brush to create. After reading these works, it really makes people feel that all the boundary and theoretical issues are not the main ones. Endless creativity and the ability to capture beauty are the most precious things for us.

The relationship between photography and painting The earliest origin of painting is the description of physical objects, the more detailed the better, that is, realism, until the Renaissance (you can look it up if you can't remember clearly). What people pursue is a detailed and practical description of things, and then an impressionist painter like Monet appeared (impressionism is Monet's earliest, but it is not as famous as Monet). People pursue paintings in other situations, and then there is an abstract school like Picasso. Painting can be said to be the predecessor of photography, which is used to describe the physical state. Many photography techniques are based on painting, such as color matching, the frame of the scene (that is, the shape of each object in the whole picture), and now there are fuzzy photography arts similar to impressionist painting.

The similarity between the two lies in the discovery of beauty. If it is simple, the photographer is to preserve beauty, and painting is to process beauty.

A painting works more or less reflects the creator's ideas and viewpoints, that is, what you see is very similar to what you photographed, and the people who painted in it have done some treatments, such as highlighting the subject, weakening the background and blurring the dividing line, and also expressing a person or landscape, which can be expressed by straight lines and curves (language from lines), or by sketches, traditional Chinese paintings, oil paintings, watercolors, gouache and prints. . . . . . Show it (in the form of painting). All this is also the individual's thoughts or subjective consciousness when choosing the above painting language or painting form (why choose watercolor instead of sketch? Why paint realistically instead of abstractly? )。

My teacher once said when teaching me sketching that if you are obsessed with painting objects that are not as good as yours, you might as well take pictures. What he means is that everyone has his own ideas, and some things that look ugly can be treated subjectively when painting. For example, this girl's hand ratio looks uncomfortable, but she can imagine or process it into a comfortable ratio when drawing. )

The relationship between photography and painting 100. Photography and painting are closely related internally. At first, photography was for painting. In the history of photography, there was a wave of photography mainly based on painting. In my understanding, the hierarchical relationship in painting is a kind of mastery and treatment of color tone, including composition, color tone and so on, which are the same problems to be solved in photography and painting.

The difference between photography and painting. The word ppt photography comes from the Greek φ? Phos (light) and γ ρ α φ ι graphics (painting, painting) or γ ρ α φ? Graphê together means "painting with light". Photography refers to the process of recording images with special equipment. Generally, we take photos with mechanical cameras or digital cameras. Sometimes photography is also called photography, that is, the process of exposing the photosensitive medium by using the light reflected by the object. Someone once said an incisive language: the photographer's ability is to transform the fleeting ordinary things in daily life into immortal visual images.

Is there a difference between photography and painting? There is a difference between photography and painting.

1. Photography tends to be on-site and objective; Painting tends to assume and idealize.

The sense of scene and objectivity of photography are determined by the physical characteristics of photographic equipment such as cameras and photographic negatives. In the whole process of photography, it is impossible to produce photographic works without the help of science and technology, the assistance of machines, the mechanical function of the camera itself and the darkroom technology. Painting is different. With a brush, a piece of paper (or a piece of cloth) and paint, the author can daub it at will and write happily.

2. Instantaneous performance.

Both photography and painting need instant freeze-frame, but the way of instant freeze-frame photography is strictly limited by heaven, earth and people. This is what the so-called "now or never" and "there is no shop after this village" mean. "Photographers can only do it in an instant, without delay, without pause, without modification and without further consideration. The moment he turned on the camera, all the details were recorded, even faster than his brain memory. " Weston's painting "Looking at photography with photography" is different. Although it can only represent a certain historical moment and a certain period of life, it is calm and free, and the painter can completely condense and store the repeated moments in his heart, and then show them confidently in the studio. The moment in painting is fixed by the painter who feels life, decides the theme, conceives the picture, drafts it, revises it repeatedly. The moment of photography is what the photographer saw, thought and captured on the spot. The focus of painting is restricted by the natural and physiological conditions of human eyes. A painter can only paint what the human eye sees. For example, there is a picture of a horse running on all fours, and people have been arguing about which hoof touches the ground. Photography is a scientific record, which often captures things that people can't see, because the lens of a camera is more accurate than the human eye when observing things. Human vision can only stay at the first cognitive level, and lens vision can even extend to the inside of the nucleus.

3. The use of light and shadow.

The recording function of light is the specialty of photography. It can be said that photography uses light to express thoughts and record feelings. Painting is slightly inferior to light. Photography is modeled by the language of light, so some people call it "light painting". In the use of light, photography has influenced painting, improved painting skills and improved the expressive force of painting. In particular, color photography technology provides light that the painter's eyes can't feel.

Be realistic

Photography relies on the mechanical and optical efficiency of the camera to describe the object it wants to express directly and truly, which is incomparable to painting. The same is to show a person, the photo can be his person, painting can only be like him, painting can be "realistic", but photography can be "documentary". If you take pictures, the person in the picture is Zhang San, not Li Si, and the scenery in Guilin is not Taihu Lake. Therefore, photography can't create a "typical" photography through fiction and shaping, just like painting. Although both photography and painting depend on tools, cameras are more restrictive to the author than brushes. Contrary to the objective documentary characteristics of the camera, you can't try to master the brush.

Photography and painting are two different art categories with different characteristics, so they cannot be confused.

What is the relationship between photography and painting? Come on, 3Q, I think the concept of "photography" will be expanded and generalized, which will eventually cover "painting", that is, painting will become a branch of "big photography". Big photography should refer to all forms that reflect objective images with subjective consciousness, regardless of any means: recording pixels in batches with cameras, rearranging and combining pixels on the basis of digital photos, or creating each pixel by hand (that is, traditional painting). Painting, like handicrafts in the category of handicrafts, is a relatively rare existence.

Is photography related to painting? Take pictures of some scenic figures, etc ... You can draw pictures.

The relationship between photography art and painting art! Photography is a plastic art. With the camera and photosensitive materials as tools, the theme is expressed by means of image composition, light, tone (or tone) and other modeling methods, and its artistic image is obtained. Photographers use cameras to reflect social life and natural phenomena and express their thoughts and feelings. According to the idea of artistic creation, using photography modeling skills, through the process of darkroom production, we can make photos with artistic appeal. "

Painting art is also a plastic art, faithful to the natural form of objective images, and a manifestation of designing objective images with highly summarized and refined figurative graphics. It has distinct image characteristics, and it is the concentration and refinement, generalization and simplification, prominence and exaggeration of real things.

Photography and painting belong to plastic arts.