Which is better, SLR camera Nikon D700 or Canon 5D II? 20 1 1 Will there be a new model? In what ways has it improved?

Actually, I really want to say D700, although the upstairs is full of invincible rabbit. There are several reasons:

1 First of all, I don't deny that Canon is five years ahead of Nikon, but Nikon's rapid development in recent years is obvious to all, so it's really hard to say which is better, Nikon or Canon, or there will be no endless debate on D700 and invincible rabbit in major photography forums.

2. One of the highlights of invincible rabbit is high-definition camera shooting, which also takes up a lot of money, but this function is really insignificant to me. First of all, his camera refers to short films. Never shoot a movie with a SLR for a long time, CMOS can't stand it. Generally speaking, tens of seconds is recommended, and the last minute level is ok, but it is really not recommended. Because I haven't tried it, it's hard to comment.

Nikon's image is very sharp, I think it should be obvious to all. I didn't understand the word at first, but I can feel it by taking a picture.

One reason why this is not recommended is that Nikon's high-end head is much more expensive than Canon's. I dare not say less than a third, but at least a thousand. . .

All the above are personal opinions, not necessarily accurate, for the landlord's reference only ~

P.S. mainly looks at invincible rabbit, which is too harmonious, so I want to say a few words for the N family ~