Both 5d2 and 600d shoot static scenes, such as wedding location. Which is better, imaging or effect?

Image quality has a lot to do with the lens! It does have something to do with the framework, which will be discussed later ~

This discussion only talks about the camera itself, not post-production. )

I think it takes 60 days to shoot a wedding dress, and 600D days is not enough (no matter how good the function is, the hardware is not enough).

The biggest difference between these cameras is the hardware configuration and operation mode, among which the most obvious difference is the operation mode.

The biggest difference is those buttons. There are many scene modes on the left shoulder in 60D, which are designed for amateurs who are not familiar with adjusting camera parameters, but there are no scene modes in 5D2. Compared with 5D2, 60D lacks shortcut keys for flash compensation and white balance, but puts these two functions in the menu on the screen.

As shown in the figure:

60D

5D2

In addition, 60D has a flash and a rotating screen, and 5D2 has none ~ Of course it doesn't matter!

Next, it's time to talk about the image quality of full-width and cut-width pairs respectively.

Although it can be as good in theory, there are many problems in practice.

Please look at the following two situations:

The photosensitive element of a full-mounted camera is larger than that of a cut-off camera. If the lens of a fully equipped camera is used for imaging, if the sensor of the fully equipped camera can capture 80% of the total brightness of the lens within 0. 1 second, then when it is mounted on a truncated camera, the sensor can only capture about 50% of the total brightness. Therefore, the total light reaching the photosensitive element of the truncated camera is not as much as that of the whole camera. If both the complete camera and the truncated camera are 6.5438+million pixels, a pixel of the truncated camera will not capture as much light as a pixel of the complete camera. In this case, the picture quality of a full-frame camera is naturally better than that of a truncated camera!

However, if all the light entering the lens shines on the photosensitive element of the truncated camera, the imaging quality of the truncated camera will be the same as that of the whole camera! Because the total amount of light incident on the photosensitive element is the same, the amount of light captured by each pixel is the same. So in this case, the picture quality of the two is just as good!

The good news is that Canon developed the "EF-S" lens for the second case!

The bad news is that Canon has not made great efforts to develop this lens family, so the emergence of "EF-S" lenses is basically just to appease camera users ~ because EF-S lenses are not only few in number, but also not top-notch in quality ~ and there is no red ring head! No hoary head!

Officials believe that this factor makes the camera stay in the low-end machine field.

So, if you have enough money, you might as well buy 5D2 ~

60 days if the funds are insufficient! Although not so full, the gap is actually quite small ~ on the other hand, the photographer's shooting skills are the most important!

Let me remind you that EF lens (all-camera lens, including all kinds of red ring head and white lens) can be used in cutting machine, and EF-S lens cannot be used in all-camera.

Over!

(Acknowledgement: The picture was taken from Zhongguancun)