Which brand of consumer-grade SLR camera is more cost-effective and has better shooting results?

In fact, there is no cost-effectiveness in any product, there is only a compromise between function and price. Therefore, the focus of each camera is different, which depends on your own needs. The cost-effectiveness promoted by merchants and media is just a promotional tool.

Canon cameras are better optimized for portraits, but have lower configurations at the same price;

Nikon cameras have a higher degree of restoration, but portraits are slightly inferior to Canon;

Fuji cameras The appearance is retro and the picture quality has a sense of the times, but the focus of mid-to-low-end machines is a bit slow (high-end machines are okay);

Most machines from Oppa and Panasonic support body image stabilization, and Canon, Nikon, and Fuji all Not supported! Moreover, the control is good, the focus is fast, and the image quality is also very good. However, the M43 camera sensor is small and the image quality is limited in low light;

Pentax has the highest configuration among SLRs in the same price range, basically low, medium and high. All cameras in this range support body anti-shake, all-weather dustproof and waterproof, and all-magnesium aluminum alloy bodies. While other manufacturers use these as gimmicks to promote high-end cameras, Pentax SLRs have long been standard equipment~~~ The only shortcoming is that there are relatively few lenses, and only the three princesses can use them...

Sony is an excellent camera brand, unrivaled in the post-digital era, with 4K video, 5-axis anti-shake, Sony has 4D focusing, etc. that other manufacturers don’t have! Many people call it "So Dafa" ~ Because the photosensitive components of camera giants such as Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Oppa, Panasonic, and Pentax are basically produced by Sony (even the camera sensors of many high-end mobile phones are also produced by Sony), so The image quality of Sony cameras is very good, and the lens lineup is also very rich. In addition, it cooperates with Zeiss, so there are a lot of lenses with excellent image quality... The only drawback is that the price of good lenses is a bit too high. ~~~The price of Canon and Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 lenses is around 10,000, but Sodafa costs 20,000~~~So many people buy Sony bodies but use lenses from other brands.

After a brief introduction, I believe you already have a preliminary understanding of the current camera brands. With the development of digital SLRs today, there is basically no difference in image quality. There is just a slight difference in image quality and style, but it is not big anymore~

If you want to recommend:

Canon 70D The one with the best balance of image quality, photography, functions and price

Nikon D7200APS-C SLR with the best image quality

Sony A63004D also has good focus, 4K video and image quality

The only full-frame model recommended by Sony A7II, the price is slightly higher, and the picture quality is great

Except for the slightly smaller sensor, Panasonic GF8 is excellent

The above are some machines I recommend that are worth buying. You can also find the one that suits you best based on the introduction. Cameras are not cost-effective. Whichever one suits you best will be the most cost-effective.