The story of "Invisible Guest" is very brain-burning. How should I understand it?

Invisible Guest is a suspense film directed by Oriol Paulo and starring mario casas, Ana Wagener, Bárbara Lennie and José Coronado. The film was released in Spain from 20 17 to 1. Because the continuous inversion increases the difficulty of understanding, I have sorted out some key inversions, which is the most brain-burning place in this film. Let's have a look.

Reason:

Murder in the chamber of secrets. Doria, an entrepreneur and male host, claimed to have a tryst with his lover Laura, and the other party extorted100000 yuan. After the two rushed to the hotel to make an appointment, the man was knocked unconscious. When he woke up, he found that Laura had been killed, and the money was scattered all over the floor. The police arrested him. It was a sealed room, the window latch was pulled out and it couldn't be opened, and the door was locked. Because the police have no direct evidence, the man has not been arrested for the time being. The man's assistant recommended a lawyer with a high winning rate, Goodman, who arrived at the man's house three hours earlier than the agreed discussion time.

Inversion 1:

Lawyer Goodman pointed out that they had found a witness against the prosecution, who was about to see the judge, and the man might appear in court in three hours.

The man thinks that the prosecution witness may be a passing driver. He told Doria about a car accident that happened before that. When the man met his lover Laura, he lied to his wife that he was in Paris. On the way home, they had a conflict about whether to continue this relationship. They accidentally hit a passing car, and the victim Daniel was dead.

Later, lover Laura refused to call the police, and the two partners cheated a driver who wanted to help. The lover put the victim's cell phone in his pocket. Later, the lover waited for rescue and let the man's cart go into the water. Soon an old man came and dragged his car home for repair. The couple invited Laura to dinner. The lover was suspected because the cell phone in Daniel's pocket rang. It turned out that the couple were the parents of the victim. Laura left in a hurry, then picked up the man and agreed not to meet again.

The man destroyed the car, reported the loss to the police and forged the record of having been to Paris. Some time later, Father Thomas called the police, and the police launched a search. The man erased the evidence of the crime. The lover faked the victim and fled with the money. The lawyer took out a newspaper photo (the mother in the photo was at the scene of the hotel where the man was framed). The lawyer concluded that the victim's father used the victim's mother's relationship to sneak into the hotel and kill the lover, and then fled through the window. In order to get rid of crime, men should blame Thomas for Laura's death, that is, they must admit Daniel's case. Later, the lawyer answered the phone and said that the prosecution witness was a passing driver. At this time, they had to blame Daniel's death on their lover, who had to tell the location of the sunken car before they could forge evidence.

Inversion 2:

The man said that he was not in a coma, just wanted to listen to the lawyer's explanation and admitted that the victim was not dead at that time. The lawyer assumed that the man took Daniel's wallet and forged the transfer record, and he also prevented the lover from calling the police. Laura told the victim's parents the truth in great pain and pretended that it was exposed. She invited the man to the hotel, compensated her parents with money, and advised him to surrender. The man refused, killed Laura and forged a framed fake photo. The man denied this assumption and asked his parents why they didn't go to the police. Lawyers think they have lost trust in the police. When they opened the curtains, they could see the father of the opposite victim staring at the man's room on the same floor of the opposite building. The lawyer said that he had investigated the victim's father and learned everything about Daniel.

Inversion 3:

The man still denied that he had killed two people in a row, and took out photos, thinking that his assumption that the victim's father was killed was completely reasonable. At this time, the lawyer pointed out that the photo was forged and there was no image of the victim's mother in the mirror. The man admitted to killing Laura, and the lawyer's hypothesis was established, and the location of the body was drawn.

Reverse 4:

The two reached an agreement. At this time, the assistant called and said that the man's mobile phone had been turned off. The lawyer suggested taking a break. The man took the phone and turned it on. He heard that his assistant bribed the passing driver.

There is electricity in the man's mobile phone, and the pen in his chest pocket oozes ink. The man put the pen on the table and found the lawyer's message-"No one went to see the judge, no prosecution witness, and all the information was fabricated." I opened the pen and found that it had been tampered with and transformed into a recording pen. At this time, the man realized that he had been cheated. In fact, the lawyer who arrived early was the victim's mother. She disguised herself as a Goodman lawyer and got the key clue. Three hours later, the real lawyer Goodman arrived. The victim's parents on the same floor opposite the building looked at him and dialed the police station.

In fact, the constant reversal of this film also implies the resilience of human heart and the darkness and coldness of human nature. It is precisely because of too many reversals that the plot burns the brain. How can we understand this film? After reading this answer, brush the movie several times.