Whose fault is it if a TV series turns into a bad movie?

The reason why a bad movie is called a "bad movie" is because it is really bad. And who should take the blame for this bad movie?

Writers, directors, photographers, producers, actors and behind-the-scenes staff, no matter which character has a problem, it will lead to the tragedy of a "bad movie".

As the first screenwriter, a good drama must of course be able to convey positive energy and valuable information, and can make the audience have *** emotions with the plot characters. If the plot is written without logic and makes it difficult for the audience to understand, let alone get emotional, then the plot is irrational and the screenwriter will take the blame;

The second director and actors. The director is responsible for the overall command of a film. If the director does not have a deep understanding of the film, he makes wrong or unreasonable judgments, and his supervision and review of the production and editing departments are not strict enough. If there are any omissions, the director must take the blame;

The actors are responsible for presenting the plot to the audience with their own performances. If their acting skills are poor and they are criticized, it will inevitably greatly reduce the ratings of the film. Actors need to take the blame; actors do not have to play every role. They must reject some illogical TV series and roles, otherwise they will really harm themselves.

For example, there is a TV series "If Time Can Turn Back". This movie is called a "bad movie", which is not unfair at all.

1. The plot is ridiculous and illogical. Three divorced men get together and waste their lives wantonly. It is childish and has no sense of responsibility.

2. At that time, I really watched this drama because of Le Dong, but who knew that this drama deceived Le Dong. I didn't see the maturity and connotation of Le Don's "congratulatory letter". Instead, this greasy uncle character "obliterated" Le Don's glory.

The third behind-the-scenes staff, photographers, producers, etc. No matter how good the plot of a movie is, how awesome the actors are, and how great the director is, if the behind-the-scenes production and special effects artists do not pay attention to the details, the overall quality of the movie will be affected. Some of the gangster scenes in the TV series were taken as amusement by many netizens and took screenshots. If there are multiple gang scenes in a TV series, then the movie will be close to a "bad movie".

A TV series is a collaborative work of a team. It requires people in each department to perform their duties and take it seriously. On the contrary, if a TV series becomes a bad movie, the screenwriter, director, actors, editing, photography, special effects and other behind-the-scenes staff may take the blame.

Why should the director take the biggest blame?

The first point: What is a director?

The director is to control the entire process of a work from script setting, casting, shooting, editing, and release, no matter which link When a problem arises, the director cannot escape the blame, which is why the director takes the biggest blame.

Second point: What works to use?

Many people sometimes blame the failure of a work on the screenwriter, thinking that the work compiled by the screenwriter is too rubbish and the director can’t make it. No good works will come out.

In this regard, I think the screenwriter has a certain reason, but is it okay for the director to be stumped? Is that the director sitting in front of the monitor?

The director is the first to know what the result will be! It must be the director who knew that the effect was not good and then accepted it through the final broadcast!

Third: Who should be used to shoot?

Many people also say that it is a problem with the actors. It is difficult for the director not to use it. The actors can shoot at will?

Although there are mandatory requirements on capital, one thing cannot be changed, and that is the director's connivance. Take "Shanghai Fortress" as an example!

Lu Han may have been added by the capital side, but Lu Han’s failure to memorize his lines on the set, take his girls to play games at night, actor costume design, image design, etc. It’s always your director’s problem, you know. Instead of guiding the change, he just let it go. In the end, it failed. If the actor made a mistake, the director would not be able to blame it.

Fourth: Editing Problems

Many work problems arise from editing, and ultimately fail. Just like the "Journey to the West" back then, one action always had to be repeated three times in a row. Over and over again, many people ended up abandoning the show because they couldn't stand it.

The director can’t blame this!

Therefore, for the emergence of a bad movie, the director must first take the blame, and it is still the big blame. After all, from the beginning of setting the project to the release of the work, the director is indispensable in every step. The rest is, It can only be said that I participated in one of the links.

For the bad movies in our country, the producers and directors should be mainly responsible, because the name of the screenwriter can hardly be seen in the title of the film; even if there is a screenwriter, his position is only a small role, it is not important, the director and producer The film does not follow the script, you can change it as you want. After a colleague's script was made into a TV movie, I asked him to tell me the name, but he refused, saying that the director had changed the script beyond recognition, and he didn't even know it was his own script after reading it... So, a TV series was made. Bad movies can only be the responsibility of the director and producer.

Hollywood, the highest level of world cinema, has always regarded screenwriters as treasures. The screenwriters in the opening credits of every film are in a prominent position.

Even if the director wants to change the script, he does it through the screenwriter. He will not piece together the script just to save money. They know that the script is the foundation of a play. If the script is bad, even if it is filmed, the audience will not buy it.

I recommend everyone to watch a Hollywood blockbuster "Love Vacation" with a rating of 9.0. It is a very good movie. In it, an old screenwriter was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award by the Screen Actors Guild after retiring for nearly 40 years; maybe this is why There are so many classic Hollywood blockbusters, which is the real reason why it stands among the world's movies.

From this, I think that in order to make good film and television dramas, we should learn from Hollywood and start by respecting the screenwriters...

Nowadays, bad movies have reached a certain level for us. This is a normal state. Now everyone only needs to look at the cast to accurately judge what level of TV series this is. Haha, it is indeed reality.

But think about the most popular fairy tale drama "Legend of Sword and Fairy" in the past. Hu Ge, Liu Yifei, Peng Yuyan and others did not promote it as much as the current online media, and there were no high-dollar movies. With no salary and no assistants to support them, this group of writers and marketers, without relying on marketing or directing, completed a TV show that cannot be surpassed by similar TV series.

Just like "Bright Sword", at that time most of us only knew Li Yunlong and Zhao Gang. I don't know the actor's name. When chatting, I often use "Third Battalion Commander! Take out my Italian cannon!" as an expression.

Many people are blaming "actors" and "facial paralyzed little fresh meat" for making unpalatable TV series and films with remuneration that ordinary people can't get in dozens of lifetimes. Movie. Thinking about it this way, it seems reasonable. In recent years, the only TV series that has been as popular as "Bright Sword" and has been popular among all ages is "In the Name of the People" filmed by a group of "outdated and unknown" actors last year. By chance, this TV series There are no popular stars in the drama. After watching it, everyone only remembers "Secretary Dakang", "I want to win over Tian Banzi", and "a little division chief who hid more than 100 million in cash".

For a time, people's condemnation of "star pay" became more and more intense, and even "relevant departments" came out to speak out.

But in my opinion, this may be the mark of this era. Just like boys and girls are keen on online literature and find classics "difficult to swallow", this is also the case with this era.

It has nothing to do with actors or fresh meat. The era advocates money, so they are products that fit the era.

Just like the great masters who emerged in large numbers during the Republic of China, that era needed them, so they naturally appeared there.

Actors more than 10 years ago did not have the pressure of a brokerage company or the comparison of pay. At that time, as long as you acted well in TV series, you were a good actor; now the basis for judging whether you are a good actor seems to be A large part of it comes from the number of fans and the amount of appearance fees!

So, it’s just that times have changed. The more you scold him, the more angry he becomes!

So, we are all people who follow the trend of this era!

This bad drama can only be blamed on this era of money worship!

First of all, we need to look at where it is bad, how it is bad, and how bad it is.

Like the previously broadcast "If Time Can Turn Back", the actors' acting skills are absolutely online, but the main reason is that the plot is too bad, so the fault lies with the screenwriter.

Like those TV series played by AB, if the movie is called a bad movie, it can only be said that it is the fault of the actors.

TV drama is a comprehensive art that requires the cooperation of multiple departments. The success or failure of a TV series depends on many factors.

First, the script. It is the premise of the entire filming, like the anchoring needle in the sea. It sets the core and tone of a drama. If in a historical drama, the characters speak internet slang, it would be so inconsistent. Then this TV drama cannot be called a historical drama, but should be a costume light comedy.

Second, director. They process the script a second time and add the director's personal aesthetics and interpretation, so the director is very important. If the director does not have a superb vision and level, and cannot thoroughly understand the script, he will often make a pot of uncooked rice that is difficult to swallow, such as those in the God of War drama.

Fourth, serve the Taoist group. This includes multiple groups such as clothing, makeup, props, etc. They can further set off the character's image, render the environment, and make the audience feel more immersed. Especially in some period dramas and costume dramas, dressing up is more important.

Fifth, actors. If the actors in a drama are not chosen well and the performances are not up to standard, no matter how good the crew is, it will be ruined. The script says that this is a desolate laugh. He must laugh sinisterly, or he will only stare and frown. This Can the character still be shaped?

To sum up, whether a TV series becomes a bad one is a comprehensive product, rather than a unilateral decision by one factor.

Generally, in the TV series we watch, the leading actors act from the beginning to the end, but there are also some TV series where the actors are changed midway for various reasons. Some of them change actors and turn into bad movies, which makes Audiences expressed that they wanted to abandon the show, but some even changed the actors and became classic TV series. Let’s take a look at the TV series that changed actors midway.

A well-known TV series that changed actors is the "Family with Children" series, in which the role of "Xia Xue" was played by Yang Zi and Ning Danlin.

Yang Zi once revealed in a show that the director knocked on the door at around 12 o'clock and directly said that the investor's daughter wanted to play this role and asked Yang Zi to pack up and leave. It was twelve o'clock at night, so Yang Zi had to pack up her things and leave with her mother. However, Yang Zi is now doing well in her career. When mentioning Xia Xue, she still thinks of Yang Zi. When changing actors, there were many The audience expressed that they wanted to abandon the show. Which TV series change the lead actors midway? One was replaced by a bad movie, and the other was replaced frequently and became a classic.

There is another TV series that everyone is familiar with, that is the 1986 version of "Journey to the West". I wonder if you have noticed that the role of Tang Monk in the TV series has been played by three actors. , respectively Wang Yue, Xu Shaohua and Chi Chongrui. Due to personal reasons, Wang Yue and Xu Shaohua left the crew early during the filming, and the Tang Seng who came to the end was officially Chi Chongrui. Although this drama changed three actors along the way, I believe this drama is still an eternal classic in everyone's mind. What do you think about changing actors?

There are many factors that go into making a TV series a bad movie. Let’s talk about my personal views.

The first point is the selection and adaptation of the script. Whether a drama can be a hit depends on the quality of the script. If it is adapted from a novel, it depends on whether the adaptation can be recognized by fans of the original work. No. Only by destroying the original work can you gain fans.

The second point is the issue of casting. To make a drama well, it needs good actors. Of course, it does not mean that there is traffic to be a good actor. It needs online acting skills. Actors who are recognized can also be close to the original work. The most important thing is that the audience will not be disappointed.

The entire industry

Screenwriter - director - editor - actor - Fu Huadao - special effects