Why do so many people like to evaluate movies from three angles?

The reasons why many people like to evaluate movies from three angles are: standing on the moral high ground and flaunting the correctness of their remarks, some people pretend to be profound and look profound, but in fact they don't understand anything.

As for how to evaluate a film, David Bordwell put forward some suggestions in the book Film Art: Form and Style. He believes that a film should be regarded as a whole and the form should be taken into account as much as possible. He put forward three criteria, namely, coherence, complexity and originality. Chinese can be translated into consistency, complexity and originality.

According to Baudville, the so-called consistency mainly comes from traditional views. Traditionally, the integrity of a work is usually regarded as a positive factor of its quality. Baudville explained that consistency refers to the strength of the effect. If a movie is vivid, exciting and fascinating, it should be regarded as a valuable work.

For movies, good or bad, stand in your own position, hold your own words, what is good in the end, each has its own rhetoric. Some people say that the standard of a good movie is good-looking and can cause several generations to sing at the same time; Some people say that a good movie is to watch and not fall asleep, and come out without regret; Some people say that good movies have no standards.

"Good" and "bad" are actually a very comprehensive concept and a collection of various factors. However, it is difficult to determine how many "factors" a film must have to become a "good film". There are some good parts in the bad movie, such as Transformers. The plot is as bad as a children's program in CCTV, but the movie of 1 is still interesting, because I have never seen such a deformation at that time-wow, the fancy turn of the whole body is better than that of the beautiful girl warrior.