Is the so-called tribute in the movie an objective fact or the audience's self-love?

What's your answer? (26 votes): As a practitioner, many people will tell you that all the pictures and paragraphs in the movie are designed in advance, even if there is a sudden inspiration on the set, they will go through it according to the designed script first and then according to the sudden inspiration. Therefore, most of them are tributes that can be seen by ordinary audiences, which are basically objective facts, and the studio does not fight unprepared battles. When it comes to paying tribute, there are two mentalities for many creators: first, he really wants to pay tribute to the master or the work in his heart. Secondly, it is in this narrative expression that due to the limitation of ability, there is really no more appropriate and appropriate method, so we can only "copy", which is euphemistically called "tribute" in order not to be criticized by the audience. But on the other hand, movies are "copied" art, and they are copied from each other. Can you deny that your most basic narrative techniques are not from pudovkin, Eisenstein and Griffith? In addition, there are some "tributes" for directors to express more sensitive metaphors, which may involve sensitive topics such as politics. It is natural to put on the coat of "tribute" and it is easy to pass the trial. As for the film with obvious tribute color, aside from being too small, there are the following for reference: 1. Hugo, Martin Scorsese's first 3D work, many people have a lot of criticisms about it, but I am still very moved after reading it. The whole article basically pays tribute to the film history and Meria, and also uses a lot of pictures in Meria's works, but the overall sense of integration of the tribute is very good. 2. "Let the Bullets Fly" Jiang Wen set up many metaphors in it, but he refused to admit it himself, but everyone could feel it if there was nothing. Some film critics say that "Let the Bullets Fly" is good-looking, because unlike many domestic films, such as boiled water, it can provide a lot of redundant information, so that the viewers can keep thinking during the movie. In fact, many of these redundant messages are metaphors, and some people have listed some specific items one by one, which is a tribute to which movies. 3. Some of Jia Zhangke's works are mixed with many things, and it is difficult to define which ones to pay tribute to. The French new wave will have more flavor. 4. "Russian Ark" This is a single-shot film. The whole film is shot in a long shot, which is extremely difficult to schedule. Photographic lenses have traveled for centuries from the first perspective, and there are many tributes to the past. I'm a poor scholar, so I think so much. I hope there is a great god to correct me. Han Yang's answer (2 votes): Some are genuine tributes, and some are over-analyzed Yang Zhen's answer ( votes): Hugo's Adventure is a standard tribute to Nan Ge's answer ( votes): If you are the only one who thinks it's a tribute, it's that you flatter yourself. If many people say so, it's probably that the director copied it intentionally or unintentionally, or at least gave the audience an answer of deja vu, which is euphemistically called "tribute" ( votes): just give an example, look at the last scene of Unbearable Night, and then look at the last scene of Angry Bull. PTA's approach is at best a tribute, but it's hard to hear that it's plagiarism and neutral. Of course, PTA itself is also very talented. Shuo yang's answer ( votes): Some salutations are still obvious. Stephen Chow's scene of blowing his hair in front of the mirror when he was assigned to go to Hongkong in "Domestic Lingling Paint" was the scene added to Tony Leung Chiu Wai at the end of "The True Story of Teddy Boy" by Wong Kar-wai, including the soundtrack. However, this passage can also be interpreted as a "spoof" ~ Zhihu users' answer ( votes): There are different opinions about paying tribute. It is understandable to pay tribute to a good work, which is also in line with the public's taste. Artistic innovation is not so simple. Nowadays, the massive TV series and movies are really overwhelming, and the methods of paying tribute are flying all over the sky. Who should we blame or question the answer of the bubble of the whole film and television industry ( votes)? Anonymous user's answer ( votes): A thousand viewers have a thousand Hamlets, so don't worry about it.