Why do many people say that the imaging quality of Sony digital cameras is not as good as Nikon and Canon? Isn't Sony's photographic element lens image processing technology excellent?

In my opinion, first of all, in terms of lens. Sony acquired Minolta, but Minolta was a big factory in the movie era. After digital SLR, Minolta's old technology can't keep up with the present pace. So after Sony acquired Minolta, it had to explore the innovation of the lens itself. Unfortunately, there is no sign yet, and there is no Sony lens to prove that Sony can catch up with Canon, Nikon and even Olympus and Pentax in lens production. Zeiss is a famous factory, and Zeiss lens is also a famous mirror. If the funds are abundant, Zeiss lens will never lose to Canon L lens, Nikon Golden Circle or Pentax Star, but the problem is that Zeiss lens is very expensive, and beginners and photographers with tight funds simply don't have much money to buy Zeiss lens.

In terms of sensors, Sony is a big sensor, but it is also a big sensor, including Samsung, Kodak and Sigma. There is still no sign that Sony's sensors have surpassed the above, and Sony's SLR has been digitized in 2004, and it has not accumulated enough experience so far, and there is no representative sensor to make it stand out.

Besides, as you said, Sony LCD, MP3 and Blu-ray are very advanced in these fields. But these are all advantages in the field of multimedia, and have little to do with optical photography. A manufacturer with advantages in multimedia will not stir up the muddy water of photography (especially SLR system) because of its advantages in this field. Sony's card machine can play Sony's advanced electronic technology, with high performance and good quality. In addition, taking the fashion route just caught up with the downward trend of photography threshold, and it can occupy a place in the card machine market. However, in the field of high-end professional photography, in Canon Nikon, an old optical factory with rich production and sales experience (SLR lenses contribute too much to quality, so optical technology is very important), Sony in photography is only a rich second generation boy. ...

These are all my experiences. If there are any omissions or mistakes, please look downstairs to add them. I hope I can help you.