Why "can't we use photography to replace figurative art to replace figurative painting art?" Please tell me 3Q

First let’s talk about the difference between photography and painting: Photography records what you see through the camera. It has less initiative without considering PS, and the process of completing the product is more convenient than painting. . The factors to be considered in the creation process of painting are very complex, and the process of painting a painting all reflects people's emotions, worldview, aesthetic orientation, artistic attainments, etc. Compared with photography, painting has more texture, and we can adjust the entire picture at any time, which means that the creative space is larger and more controllable. If the camera can replace figurative painting, then it can also be said that the camera can replace the development of art. Art has continuity. Photography is just a very young branch. It cannot be confused with the same thing, let alone the camera can replace the brush.

The creation of nature and the creation of man will be more valuable. However, most of the elements of figurative photography are just copying the creation of nature, so the feeling of looking at photos and the feeling of looking at paintings are two different things.